forums.rs

Forums

Official Lore FC!

Quick find code: 341-342-647-65739374

of 75
SwedishPagns

SwedishPagns

Posts: 8,899 Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Goddamn it.

Edit: Ah...well...results are results I guess...complaining won't change anything. ·
{
×
}
`·.„¸¸,.¤*°‘°•¸
I wish I was in Dixie land
¸•°‘°*¤.,¸¸„.·´
{
×
}
·

26-Mar-2016 05:26:31 - Last edited on 26-Mar-2016 05:34:02 by SwedishPagns

Raleirosen

Raleirosen

Posts: 5,069 Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Now that that's over, I think it would be prudent to iron out rules for both the FC in general as well as how generals are meant to moderate it... I assume Dethal will have some input of his own on those two points. But I imagine we can start off with (and perhaps even end on) the simple stuff: no spamming, no flaming, that sort of thing. Patrolling Lore FC almost makes you wish for a Great Revision.

26-Mar-2016 05:44:27 - Last edited on 26-Mar-2016 05:47:13 by Raleirosen

Eridyn
Dec Member 2010

Eridyn

Posts: 2,947 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I suppose the vote stands, sadly I haven't been as active lately so I couldn't have some say. I would agree with Raleirosen's post above however.
@Eriddyn
|
Lorehound
| [
Role-Player
| "A flame can never be a star, no matter how bright it burns." -
Jas
.

26-Mar-2016 14:54:15

Raxxess

Raxxess

Posts: 2,236 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I'd like to offer my input as far as rules.

We should just have the most basic rules.

No excessive spamming and generals only intervene when a conversation is truly getting toxic (excessive name calling, personal attacks, threats, or when a debate has become very heated and gone on for a long period of time with no one getting anywhere).

I really think we should advise generals to only act when it is absolutely necessary that way it can be a fair combo of option 1 and option 3.

And then we don't have all the rule change hearings and excessive moderation that is impossible to enforce and just declines activity in the chat.
Saradomin Lore clan
- Aegis of Saradomin

26-Mar-2016 15:44:04 - Last edited on 26-Mar-2016 15:44:32 by Raxxess

Raxxess

Raxxess

Posts: 2,236 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Eren Lapucet said :
Also rules about politics, religion, and obscenity (eg. ***, some stuff Aegon says - no offense).

Honestly i'm probably taking the less popular position here, but I think we should allow discussion on politics/religion.

I mean we have to come to the realization that as quests take longer to release and bottle quests and other pieces of lore get cut we just don't have the ability to have an active chat that only discusses lore because there just isn't much to discuss, if it gets way out of hand then yes a general should intervene and stop it but it should be done on each individual occurrence rather than rules that limit the conversation or parts of it altogether.
Saradomin Lore clan
- Aegis of Saradomin

27-Mar-2016 03:13:47

Raleirosen

Raleirosen

Posts: 5,069 Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Eren Lapucet said :
Also rules about politics, religion, and obscenity (eg. ***, some stuff Aegon says - no offense).
No need for bans on certain topics; religion and/or politics can be discussed civilly. If/when such discussions turn into shouting matches, "no flaming/no spamming" rules would be sufficient.

I wouldn't necessarily be opposed to a mild "keep it (mostly) PG13" rule, though. Patrolling Lore FC almost makes you wish for a Great Revision.

27-Mar-2016 03:14:35 - Last edited on 27-Mar-2016 03:19:34 by Raleirosen

Quick find code: 341-342-647-65739374 Back to Top