So, Saradomin says that he fought to protect the Naragi, yet everyone who could possibly corroborate his story were "oblivious" to his actions and didn't know that he changed his mind and tried to defend them. He’s being mendacious. This is not justification, in my eyes, and we have every right to bastardize him for what he did during that time.
I agree that his actions in taking the wand in The Death of Chivalry should not be a reason to belittle Saradomin, although I dislike him, his decisions and his actions, I would have done the same thing in this situation if I was trying to save a fallen friend.
To me, Saradomin is not entirely none-virtuous, but he is not "incredibly so" as you say. To me his virtue is on the same scale as any, average human. There is both good and bad, and a balance between the two. There isn't more good than bad as Saradominist's claim, or more bad than good as Zamorakian's claim, this is what happens when you were human before your ascension.
The Book of the Gods, Saradomin Section does not show "Saradomin's caring nature" or "his dedication to justice," it simply shows that Saradomin chooses his own goals before his people, and that he'd not attend to them to the point of them believing he'd forgotten about them until his goals were achieved. Along with that, it was written by a believer of Saradomin, I believe that to be biased. It's like a Zamorakian preaching good about Zamorak, or a Zarosian about Zaros, it's purely one-sided. A neutral view is what I believe to be an accurate one.
15-Apr-2016 19:56:19
- Last edited on
15-Apr-2016 19:56:32
by
Jack Bowe