forums.rs

Forums

Old School General Chat Lounge Thread is sticky

Quick find code: 317-318-503-65438311

of 1225
V a
Nov Member 2023

V a

Posts: 7,986 Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
They're about 600-900K per hour depending on your levels, setup and gear.

It's nice to see a semi-afkable monster that can be camped for some decent loot, without having an incredibly high Slayer requirement. It's not like you're instantly rich if you camp them for a day though, which is what some people like to think. (And they're quite boring to kill) They might be a bit overpowered, but it seems fair that there's a way to make roughly 500K+ per hour in the game at this point in time. 600-900 is perhaps a bit too much, but you won't hear me complain :p

20-Nov-2014 18:19:13

Norne
Jan
fmod Member
2012

Norne

Forum Moderator Posts: 76,250 Emerald Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Except where it devalues other higher lvl monsters and skills. "When history witnesses a great change, Razgriz reveals itself... first, as a dark demon. As a demon, it uses its power to rain death upon the land, and then it dies. However, after a period of slumber, Razgriz returns, this time, as a great hero"

20-Nov-2014 18:49:28

ScapeRune
Nov Member 2022

ScapeRune

Posts: 33,509 Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Idk it kinda makes sense to me. Seems silly that people can pk in almost completely untradeable gear and make it so that they don't drop any loot when they die. Isn't that why giving penance skirt +1 strength bonus failed?
Cabbage? CABBAGE!

21-Nov-2014 14:12:08

San
Jul Member 2023

San

Posts: 4,259 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
People complain that pking wasn't profitable, because most of the opponents items are untradeable and so they don't get anything for them. But the reason people use untradeables is because they'll lose less if they die. So really, pkers are the reason pking is unprofitable. They want to get a good reward if they get a kill, but don't want to lose much if they die.

Cannae have yer cake and eat it. Sailing

21-Nov-2014 14:26:12

ScapeRune
Nov Member 2022

ScapeRune

Posts: 33,509 Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Well the mysterious emblems were a good idea. They at least make it so that pking produces something otherwise all it does is use up supplies which isn't sustainable if that's all people want to do.
Cabbage? CABBAGE!

21-Nov-2014 14:40:32

Norne
Jan
fmod Member
2012

Norne

Forum Moderator Posts: 76,250 Emerald Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
San said :
People complain that pking wasn't profitable, because most of the opponents items are untradeable and so they don't get anything for them. But the reason people use untradeables is because they'll lose less if they die. So really, pkers are the reason pking is unprofitable. They want to get a good reward if they get a kill, but don't want to lose much if they die.

Cannae have yer cake and eat it*

** disagrees "When history witnesses a great change, Razgriz reveals itself... first, as a dark demon. As a demon, it uses its power to rain death upon the land, and then it dies. However, after a period of slumber, Razgriz returns, this time, as a great hero"

21-Nov-2014 14:43:09

Beatrix
Jun Member 2014

Beatrix

Posts: 1,874 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
San said :
People complain that pking wasn't profitable, because most of the opponents items are untradeable and so they don't get anything for them. But the reason people use untradeables is because they'll lose less if they die. So really, pkers are the reason pking is unprofitable. They want to get a good reward if they get a kill, but don't want to lose much if they die.

Cannae have yer cake and eat it.

Very well said, couldn't have said it any better myself :)

The phrase as I know it is "Cannae save yer cake if ya eat it."

21-Nov-2014 14:46:12 - Last edited on 21-Nov-2014 14:47:23 by Beatrix

Quick find code: 317-318-503-65438311 Back to Top