Yes, let's not forget that people lose their goals, but Konota is safe forever, right? Le me didn't get mercy, but I already offered the solution to prevent crashing prices without immediately adding quantity.
Nobody offered a safe method of bringing Turkey's back that preserves their cost value, so they were brought back and le me lost megabillions. But a safe method has been offered for partyhats and the reality is that no explanation about how it destroys anything about their actual values has been explained yet. You just can't explain the flaws.
Also, the only value this preserving method ruins is the artificial value Blackwing speaks of, which nobody else has ever shown concern for. Nobody actually would care who has an original from the beginning vs a new from the store. A partyhat with a high wealth status is simply that, a partyhat, used to show off their wealth.
Your opinions here can affect us all. Please post for the better
Konota
said
:
Whatusaytome
said
:
You cannot even say the flaws in the idea, ignorant child. Specify the flaws like I've beenasking you people to do. If you even can.
I didn't indeed, others did. But you refused to read or failed to see the logic in it.
You are pulling a Draco, by saying you already explained it without saying anything.
Specify every flaw with your next post or admit you can't.
Your opinions here can affect us all. Please post for the better
Whatusaytome
said
:
Yes, let's not forget that people lose their goals, but Konota is safe forever, right? Le me didn't get mercy, but I already offered the solution to prevent crashing prices without immediately adding quantity.
Nobody offered a safe method of bringing Turkey's back that preserves their cost value, so they were brought back and le me lost megabillions. But a safe method has been offered for partyhats and the reality is that no explanation about how it destroys anything about their actual values has been explained yet. You just can't explain the flaws.
Also, the only value this preserving method ruins is the artificial value Blackwing speaks of, which nobody else has ever shown concern for. Nobody actually would care who has an original from the beginning vs a new from the store. A partyhat with a high wealth status is simply that, a partyhat, used to show off their wealth.
Can't admit you are wrong? Or need I say just leave the thread since you lost?
Your opinions here can affect us all. Please post for the better
Konota
said
:
Whatusaytome
said
:
You are pulling a Draco,
Let's just stop. There's no use in this. You just like to flame the ones that do not support & see logic. Or I.
Yes, I argue with those who don't support without logical reasons. Thanks for admitting your fault.
Similarly, I appreciate those who see and understand the logic and support. Maybe you should explain your logic as to my flaws and make me understand your arguments instead of not. Maybe if I understood what parts concerned you, the idea and concept would be edited again, as I've done every single time you've previously pointed out flaws.
Your opinions here can affect us all. Please post for the better
Konota
said
:
Pikachu78
said
:
vet cape shows exactly how long youve been around
Didn't know there was a 6 years cape.
What I do know is that bunny ears are from 2003.
Pikachu78
said
:
items to yourselfs
I do not own bunny, scythe, but ok.
While party hats, santa hats are available since they are tradeable.
Also best for community? Yep, let's make sure that a lot of players lose their bank. Sure is best for the community. x)?
And again, didn't know polls were static.
how would people lose bank? we are talking about the non-tradeable ones that you cant get anymore. ok now theres a solution have a 6-year vetcape . yes ok so there from 03 and the fact you dont even own it says something. its says you dont even want these these items at all . you think that if you cant have it then no one can which is not a good thing and just add more toxicity to the issue at hand.
Pikachu78
said
:
Konota
said
:
Pikachu78
said
:
vet cape shows exactly how long youve been around
Didn't know there was a 6 years cape.
What I do know is that bunny ears are from 2003.
Pikachu78
said
:
items to yourselfs
I do not own bunny, scythe, but ok.
While party hats, santa hats are available since they are tradeable.
Also best for community? Yep, let's make sure that a lot of players lose their bank. Sure is best for the community. x)?
And again, didn't know polls were static.
how would people lose bank? we are talking about the non-tradeable ones that you cant get anymore. ok now theres a solution have a 6-year vetcape . yes ok so there from 03 and the fact you dont even own it says something. its says you dont even want these these items at all . you think that if you cant have it then no one can which is not a good thing and just add more toxicity to the issue at hand.
Re-read what I and whatyousay said, we were talking about the tradeable ones.
Also, nty for every-year cape.
Hello Moto