forums.rs

Forums

Poll #1 now live

Quick find code: 294-295-165-64712900

of 40
Hustler
Nov Member 2023

Hustler

Posts: 68 Iron Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
its such a shame for the ftp pk worlds though, the vote should have been to keep them out, not have them in, because they were already there in 07, its too late to save it now though i think, a lot of people i play with have been prepping their accounts for ftp pk, and I'm scared a lot of them will leave it doesn't pass.

15-Mar-2013 17:51:05

Dragon Hat
Apr Member 2018

Dragon Hat

Posts: 335 Silver Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Original message details are unavailable.
"For the first few polls we're intending to offer up 'quick wins' which we can get published fairly quickly, and we've made sure that everything offered in the poll can be done in a time frame of weeks rather than months."

-

You make me very concerned with your use of "quick wins"... does that mean you will only be offering up ideas you believe the community will vote in favor of (which leads me to the concern that you will simply "round up" the vote the way the vote for Old School was)?

I think there is one item that you -should- add to the next poll...

Let the players decide how many total levels required to vote. MANY are in agreement that 100 is simply too low and allows the Old School haters to impact the game in negative ways.

I see the 100 total requirement as a very tiny.. baby step.. and would like to see you let the old school players decide the requirements, given that the votes DO have an impact on the game.

I think with quick wins they mean things they can easily and quickly implement because they require little to no changes to the game.

15-Mar-2013 19:03:00

Tslat

Tslat

Posts: 742 Steel Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
All the questions are getting voted yes, did no-one see this coming?


100 Level-limit is too low.. make it at least 300
If every poll goes like this, What the F___ is the point of rs2007? it'll just keep getting updated and we're back in the same stupid cycle.

Lucky it's got a 75% approval margin, that's the only thing holding it back at the moment...

15-Mar-2013 20:36:38 - Last edited on 15-Mar-2013 20:40:15 by Tslat

FallyMasscre

FallyMasscre

Posts: 456 Silver Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
double post.
………. ¸°ˆ ›,……¸• ¨¨°¸ …
Fally
…ˆ¯¯ˆ¸
¸*ˆˆ*+;„¸¸,.`-'´...,.¸¸..'…¸
Masscre
,¸'
',¸.……'.,.¸.,.¬ ˆ ˆ ¬.,¸.¸,.·´
— veteran —

15-Mar-2013 21:07:43 - Last edited on 15-Mar-2013 21:08:19 by FallyMasscre

FallyMasscre

FallyMasscre

Posts: 456 Silver Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
75% is too high and you have to count the nonvoters too.

Whatever gets voted in should pass. 60% yes 40% no is a better ratio imo.
………. ¸°ˆ ›,……¸• ¨¨°¸ …
Fally
…ˆ¯¯ˆ¸
¸*ˆˆ*+;„¸¸,.`-'´...,.¸¸..'…¸
Masscre
,¸'
',¸.……'.,.¸.,.¬ ˆ ˆ ¬.,¸.¸,.·´
— veteran —

15-Mar-2013 21:07:59

Chanties
Sep Member 2023

Chanties

Posts: 15 Bronze Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I really don't think the f2p styled world is fair. The reason there are so many "no" votes is because unless they are actually pkers they won't say yes. Also, a better way to see who wants the f2p styled worlds would make it an optional vote. Since it is mandatory a lot of the voters just say no because they won't be pking. If it was optional, there would be hardly any no votes. I really don't think it is fair if these worlds don't come out, and many of the people who just came for f2p pking, including myself, will quit. I hope Jagex takes a hard look at this problem.

15-Mar-2013 21:10:25

Angel2D4

Angel2D4

Posts: 15,772 Opal Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
"The reason there are so many "no" votes is because unless they are actually pkers they won't say yes."

--

I am proof that that's not true.

I am NOT a pker, and I voted yes. "Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity" -Martin Luther King Jr.

15-Mar-2013 22:04:53

Quick find code: 294-295-165-64712900 Back to Top