forums.rs

Forums

Poll #1 now live

Quick find code: 294-295-165-64712900

of 40
Dragon Hat
Apr Member 2018

Dragon Hat

Posts: 335 Silver Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Original message details are unavailable.


another example of some one trying to take away some elses right to vote

shows the true spirit of runescape

I am not trying to take away anyone's right to vote, on NEW features. I'm saying that these are OLD features which should be in OSRS because they were a huge part of the game from the beginning. NEW features, like bank tabs, grimy herbs etc, should have a vote, and everyone has to get a say in them.

17-Mar-2013 17:18:00

Invaderderp

Invaderderp

Posts: 5 Bronze Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Alot of people will just quit if they don't put in f2p PK worlds. Especially if they use the 75% requirement as an excuse over a poll that is already won by majority.

That was apart of the game back in 2007. People will burn out on this stripped version.

17-Mar-2013 22:34:35

[#SL333O6Z1]

[#SL333O6Z1]

Posts: 85 Iron Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I think the poll question on the f2p worlds for pkers is too ambiguous, and should be clarified and redone in another poll. When I saw it, I thought it meant that f2p worlds would be added (as in, whole world is f2p, and they are new servers rather than redoing some of the current servers as f2p instead of p2p). I've seen other people saying that they would just have f2p limits on gear in the wilderness, and the rest of the worlds would be p2p. Some people also seem to think that actual f2p worlds would be an option, and are voting no on f2p-for-members worlds for that reason.

So, basically, the poll question doesn't make clear:
1) Would the f2p worlds replace current p2p ones, or would they be added in addition to the current p2p worlds?
2) Would the whole world be f2p, or just the wilderness?
3) Actual f2p worlds are NOT an option.

Also, is anyone else getting really annoyed at the people voting 'no' on everything out of a knee-jerk reaction because 'no changes evar!' without even realizing that probably half the things on this poll were actually there IN 07?

18-Mar-2013 01:45:03

Syresa

Syresa

Posts: 8 Bronze Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Original message details are unavailable.

Also, is anyone else getting really annoyed at the people voting 'no' on everything out of a knee-jerk reaction because 'no changes evar!' without even realizing that probably half the things on this poll were actually there IN 07?
Can you explain why the things that you say we're in the game in 2007, are not in the version of August 2007? Did I miss something here? How is it possible that a full version, a full backup, is without some of the things it was on that exact moment?

Also, F2P Pk worlds would mess with the economy. So a 'no' for me.

18-Mar-2013 16:01:02

Donn

Donn

Posts: 21 Bronze Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
See i feel that it should stay at 75%. This is a solid percent of the votes, if it was any less then it wouldn't be the majority of the players.. this would decrease the amount of players on the game therefore making it less fun for you and others. If you made it higher then i don't think that it would affect much.. It would just be hard to get stuff added. So in conclusion all i'm saying is that the 75% is perfect!

19-Mar-2013 03:49:14

Simple iYOLO

Simple iYOLO

Posts: 141 Iron Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Original message details are unavailable.
See i feel that it should stay at 75%. This is a solid percent of the votes, if it was any less then it wouldn't be the majority of the players.. this would decrease the amount of players on the game therefore making it less fun for you and others. If you made it higher then i don't think that it would affect much.. It would just be hard to get stuff added. So in conclusion all i'm saying is that the 75% is perfect!



actually, if you huffed less paint and paid more attention in math, they could lower the votes to 51% required and it would still be a majority

i like your reasoning although you seem to be totally void of any form of logic. Any company who choses willingly to ignore the wants of 70% of its community is destined to fail

19-Mar-2013 13:15:26

Quick find code: 294-295-165-64712900 Back to Top