Forums

Old School RuneScape Anyone?

Quick find code: 294-295-158-64458191

I Spike I

I Spike I

Posts: 421 Silver Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I will be following this progress carefully, although Runescape 2004-2007 were the sweet years, company's and content have to evolve to maintain interest. Yes back then were some of the best years with a "fuzzy feeling" I still enjoy playing the main game.
Only time will tell but it will certainly be nice to jump back for a few days

14-Feb-2013 08:34:03

Anti Hero

Anti Hero

Posts: 115 Iron Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
@g00ddragon1 If you were truly loyal you would be paying extra for the 07 server as well.

750k votes is a bit steep and there's absolutely zero chance we reach that but hopefully we can do 250k an get by with that.

Thank you!

14-Feb-2013 08:34:20 - Last edited on 14-Feb-2013 08:35:28 by Anti Hero

monkeyscool

monkeyscool

Posts: 28 Bronze Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Regarding the posts above me; there will be no Godswords and no rares.

To Jagex: While you may be listening and acting; you're going about this very unfairly. I was a paying member from 2006 to mid 2012, spread out over many different accounts. I cancelled my membership because of a few things, EoC, game direction and SoF (Pay2Win). Why don't people who HAD a membership active for a long amount of time have a say? The people who want this most have quit because of EoC and game direction. How is it expected to get a somewhat decent 07 (250k votes) when only 50-80k players are on at a time? Even if that's not all of them, a 200k jump from 50k is huge, it should be more like 125k.

So we have 2 options, get 50k votes (which I'm 99% sure we will) and have to pay an extra $15 dollars a month for members (I live in AUS, this will cost me $25p/m!) and have no anti-bot technology, or option 2, 200k~ people buy membership for an update that will take over one month, so the quitters are basically PAYING to vote.
I bet you will have ads on the vote page too. More mulah, eh?
I would be okay with $5-10 extra charge, but not 15. Take a step back and look at this. You can handle this vote better.

Rant question over, calm question is this.
IF we get the 50k vote version, but then when the servers launch A LOT more people play, will you consider THEN adding anti-bot software and lowering the membership fee? Simple economics, higher fee = less players, more money, lower fee = more players, still the same money gain, made up from the more players. They're both the same, and option B is good for EVERYONE.

14-Feb-2013 08:34:36

ukwolf1

ukwolf1

Posts: 255 Silver Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
sounds interesting! I like the flat playing field approach, all starting afresh, but i think the financial side of things is a bit out of whack, if the game effectively isn't supported (getting to lvl 1) then hwo is a $15 membership justifiable? i've not read the whole thread, but it would be helpful if a brief outline of how the game was when the backup was taken, I.E what skills wouldn't be there, trading restrictions, the state wildy was in (safe or pking) etc. i'm in favour of it, but will have to give some thought to whether or not i would want to pay extra to play it, i guess a lot depends on the level of support it gets

14-Feb-2013 08:35:28

Quick find code: 294-295-158-64458191 Back to Top