Joel
said
:
If you're after a definitive list of the do's and donts',
Maynne said :
No fmod can answer your question with a definitive enumeration of do's and don'ts.
Again, I'm not asking for a "definitive list of the do's and donts".
I've already said that:
NexOrigin said :
Joel said :
I'm not going to post an exhaustive list of all the do's and dont's in the same way the Code of Conduct doesn't list out all subjects that are deemed appropriate, or not appropriate. I'm not asking for that. I'm just asking what definition of "politics" or criteria is being used to determine if a thread is "political".
I'm just looking for some clarity on what definition of "politics" is being used. I've listed specific definitions, and asked if those are included in the definition being used. I didn't get an answer on that.
I'm not asking for some exhaustive list of do's and don't's. I'm just asking "what is considered politics?".
Are we basing it on the root of the word "policy"? Are discussions about office policies considered politics? What about school politics? Would a discussion about "worst school policies" considered politics? What about family politics (ie. household policies)? What about things that are government regulated (ex. stock market)?
I was content at this point:
NexOrigin said :
So if I've got this correct, political discussions (beyond "governments, political leaders, upcoming elections and political movements") are allowed, so long as they aren't "likely to bait, cause conflict and/or create a toxic environment"?
Or have I misinterpreted that? That was a vague enough explanation that it could be broadly applied, but specific enough to provide good guidance.
But, I didn't even get an answer when I asked if I had interpreted it correctly. I'm better than you, but that doesn't mean you're not great!
If you're after a definitive list of the do's and donts',
Maynne said :
No fmod can answer your question with a definitive enumeration of do's and don'ts.
Again, I'm not asking for a "definitive list of the do's and donts".
I've already said that:
NexOrigin said :
Joel said :
I'm not going to post an exhaustive list of all the do's and dont's in the same way the Code of Conduct doesn't list out all subjects that are deemed appropriate, or not appropriate. I'm not asking for that. I'm just asking what definition of "politics" or criteria is being used to determine if a thread is "political".
I'm just looking for some clarity on what definition of "politics" is being used. I've listed specific definitions, and asked if those are included in the definition being used. I didn't get an answer on that.
I'm not asking for some exhaustive list of do's and don't's. I'm just asking "what is considered politics?".
Are we basing it on the root of the word "policy"? Are discussions about office policies considered politics? What about school politics? Would a discussion about "worst school policies" considered politics? What about family politics (ie. household policies)? What about things that are government regulated (ex. stock market)?
I was content at this point:
NexOrigin said :
So if I've got this correct, political discussions (beyond "governments, political leaders, upcoming elections and political movements") are allowed, so long as they aren't "likely to bait, cause conflict and/or create a toxic environment"?
Or have I misinterpreted that? That was a vague enough explanation that it could be broadly applied, but specific enough to provide good guidance.
But, I didn't even get an answer when I asked if I had interpreted it correctly. I'm better than you, but that doesn't mean you're not great!
16-Feb-2021 14:46:57