If such a thing were possible, would our planets resources begin to deplete or become scarce? Would there be enough food to continue living forever. Perhaps the 1%.
Average people are dead.
"Why are you posting threads, asking questions and making discussion???"
Badboy O0
said
:
I would continue to play rs all day
Forever is a long time, what would you do once you max everything out?
Squallsy
said
:
living forever as a race as shitty as humanity? wtf is wrong with these people
i want to be an avian fishman who has a trunk, thats how i will live on forever
Humanity isn't great right now, but if you live forever you'd be able to see humanity change over the rest of its lifetime. Do you think things will get worse, or better?
Baknoob
said
:
There are lots of tangible factors about death, the state you persist in (for example, not many people would see the point in living in a perpetual state of old age merely for the sake of immortality), whether you can exhaust all possible things in life, whether things such as morality really matter any more, as we have endless time to pay for our crimes, 'life imprisonment' will have a new meaning. What's to stop us trying something illegal to pay with our infinite time we have to repent for it?
I think the idea of exhausting all possible things is an interesting idea, and the idea that all of that time could represent a kind of infinite gain in the value a person can provide.
I think understanding the limits of what humanity can possibly achieve in the universe could be a huge discussion on its own. Technology that enables us to live forever would just be the start.
Regardless of a person's lifespan, choosing to rationally commit a crime despite a penalty would still involve evaluating the gain of committing the crime versus the cost of spending time in prison. In fact, the consequences of committing a crime could be greater because a permanent record of bad behaviour could be much more permanent. Imagine being impossible to employ for eternity because employers only accept people with a clean record.
Baknoob
said
:
Other things about 'immortality' is the form it takes - does that mean we are simply immune to death (for example, could we just float around space and not have to worry about a lack of oxygen, etc.) I realise the sense in which it makes more logical sense is an inability to die of old age, but that raises the issue of staying perpetually old like I mentioned earlier. I think everyone would be down for living longer if they got to stay at the body age/health of about 25.
There are some interesting things about death, too. Not the phenomenon itself, that's relatively straightforward, rather life leading up to death. We can never theoretically exhaust all possibilities in life, they are quite simply limitless. But also the phenomenon of death is both a limiting factor in our life and opening of possibilities. It depends how you view it. We're either limited in the sense of the finiteness of our life, so we can't do everything we like. Or you could take a more open view that the very knowledge that we're going to die forces us to open up and explore the world, do more things than we otherwise would.
These are definitely really interesting things to think about in a situation where living forever is possible. It's definitely easiest and most comfortable to imagine living forever through the appearance of your most healthy point in life as it is now. The world currently has many people unsatisfied with their appearance who go out of their way to change it. I'd imagine that in a world where everyone lives forever, the technology would also be available that would allow people to look much more closely to how they want to look, however that may be. (e.g. avian fishman with a trunk)
I think your points about motivation and death are interesting, and how it could have effects that go either way. I think there are a huge number of other factors that influence motivation so that's why it's hard to work out its effects.
Baknoob
said
:
An interesting thing to think about is: why, if we found out we'd die in a year or so, would we try to 'live' more right now? Do more things? Is that not a perpetual possibility, and are we too lazy to grasp the things we really should?
Personally, I'm just waiting excitedly for scientific advances that let us know what we previously couldn't know. I've never been interested in exploring parts the planet because I think the greater surprises are in things that no one has ever seen or been able to see.
Singularity
said
:
I think by immortality they just mean stopping the ageing process that usually kills us if nothing else does. I highly doubt that by 2045, we'd reach true immortality (where nothing can kill us). A true immortal race would be a type 2 civilisation according to the Kardashev scale - for a civilisation of this type, nothing known to science can wipe them out. We're currently type 0 and are expected to reach type 1 by 2100.
Personally, I guess it'll be cool to live forever. I'd love to see all the technological and scientific advancements as time goes on. I'm deeply interested in all that stuff. It'd be nice to live through all that.
I'm definitely with you on that one. I just spent way too long reading about the feasibility of a Dyson Sphere. I wonder what the world will look like if it gets to that point where it'll be economically beneficial to do.
One of the things I've thought about is what it would be like to live on a planet that wasn't fortunate enough to have the resources to send anything out of its atmosphere. It makes me wonder what kind of conditions would be required for a planet to get to a point where it has life intelligent enough to be aware of the possibility of space travel, but also that its available resources wouldn't allow it. What would the lifetime of that planet be like?
I could probably go for pseudo-immortality (not aging, impervious to disease, hunger, etc), as long as there's a way to die eventually, be it from physical trauma or something that removes that pseudo-immortality.
I'd refuse 'true' immortality. Not being able to die ever is scarier than actually dying if you think about it.
21-May-2016 08:48:18
- Last edited on
21-May-2016 08:53:09
by
Morgan
Singularity
said
:
The only issue with being immortal (true immortality) is: what if you got fed of and actually wanted to die? Living for so long is bound to have negative effects on the human mind. While we fear Death now and wish we could live forever, it'd probably get to the point where you'll actually wish you could die and finally rest. We tend to want what we can't get.
I haven't read anything about the possibility of absolute immortality before, and it would only take one exception for it to no longer be absolute. I think the kind of intelligent beings we would be talking about would have to be very specifically designed for it to survive things like extreme temperatures and pressures.
I'd imagine that if a civilization was advanced enough to create such a powerful level of immortality, it would also provide either some means to end your life, or some kind of alternative (something like drugs that change your memory or state of mind). Otherwise, someone who feels like they're being tortured like that could cause some risk to other people in the society...
Singularity
said
:
It'll start with stopping the ageing process (that naturally kills us), then move on to complete immunity from all viruses known to man and continue to move in those stages, getting better and better each time before finally reaching true immortality.
All this stuff interests me. Exciting times ahead for the future
I read recently about a macromolecule that was recently created that is designed to be able to attack any virus based on the features that are common between them all. Check this out:
http://secondnexus.com/technology-and-innovation/molecule-could-destroy-all-viruses/
Blasty
said
:
That's fair enough What makes you so worried that people are going to go round torturing everyone?
We live in that kinda world.
On the topic of torture, if we were subject to it for a lifetime, would we not adapt to it? Like how you can't smell your aftershave/perfume after a little while because your senses (in this case your sense of smell) climatise to it, would your physical receptors that sense pain adapt to a life of perpetual pain?
Psychological
pain would be almost inarguably more intolerable. But then again, there are cases of some subject to such degrees of psychological trauma that they become desensitised to various emotions, feelings, and so forth.
That's not what this thread is about, overly, but it could be linked to immortality.
I wonder what effect immortality, in general, would have on our general emotions. Probably the greatest cause of psychological stress is death (or the knowledge that it is impending; for example knowing a relative has a life-threatening illness, the death hasn't occurred, but it's still a psychologically draining even). But this wouldn't be the case in a life of immortality.
I guess next you'd look at heartbreak. But heartbreak is merely temporary in most cases, and perhaps heartbreak often occurs because you think you'd never meet someone like that again
in your life
, but this changes with immortality; suddenly you've got endless time to enjoy life with other people.
Perhaps love itself as a concept may change meaning - you marry someone (realistically), with the intention of being together for 50 odd years? If you married someone in a state of immortality, it's a different ball game to conceive of being with the same person for an infinite amount of time. That's pretty scary, actually.