forums.rs

Forums

RS-Linkify Thread is sticky

Quick find code: 261-262-33-65181208

of 1105
Indecent Act

Indecent Act

Posts: 7,456 Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Hevilmystic said :
Wrong thread, I know, but I figure you'd read it quicker here:

Is there any chance you could merge these two:

http://www.indecentcode.com/test/index.php?id=Rowley#

http://www.indecentcode.com/test/index.php?id=Imola#

Albeit a lot is missing from Rowley D:

Hmmm couple of problems with that. I don't actually store the data. It's thanks to google that they keep this stuff cached for years.
Example: http://www.indecentcode.com/test/index.php?id=Zarfot

So it's not a matter of merging stored data, and also 200 entries is the limit. So either way you'd lose data. But keeping them separate means you have a permanent record of Imola, as long as no one else uses that name and has an active public alog.

I don't have a simple solution. Tbh I stay well away from name changes because I can't incorporate a one size fits all method into my pages.

02-Aug-2014 16:52:11

Indecent Act

Indecent Act

Posts: 7,456 Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
The possibility exists where I could make it so you you could enter two names and I could perhaps make two requests and merge the two on the fly.

But I need to do some work on the alog before I attempt something like that.

Edit: I'll put some thought into it, and keep it in mind next time I work on it :)

02-Aug-2014 17:24:37 - Last edited on 02-Aug-2014 17:25:45 by Indecent Act

Indecent Act

Indecent Act

Posts: 7,456 Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Message to
Blasty
...

I've noticed not everyone is using the embed URL for the polls. Some people are just copy/pasting the URL from the address bar.

So I've made some changes and RS Linkify will embed a poll with URL like this...

ht tps://hlf-polls.appspot.com/71

I just check to see /e/ is not there and if not, I check to see if the last part of the URL is numeric. If so, I insert the /e/ into the URL along with ?H=500 and embed that.

I haven't noticed any adverse side effects but I wanted to let you know in case you see something that's not right. If there is a problem with this please let me know :)

03-Aug-2014 09:04:03

Amaethwr
Aug Member 2008

Amaethwr

Posts: 14,634 Opal Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Indecent Act said :
Amaethwr said :
I daren't even check where I rank now.
I checked, and it looks very respectable. :)
Thanks, I'm happy with my 200m rank :P But I meant my ranking on the RuneTracker records page. So much bxp etc and those growth-skipping potions from giant mole, that I've probably dropped way down from 3rd.. Oh well, I had my time, I guess. :P
Selective Completionist

03-Aug-2014 21:07:01

Lifer
Jul Member 2008

Lifer

Posts: 12,424 Opal Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I've been holding this compatibility issue for a while. One feature I didn't like too much was the blow up feature when clicking on an embedded image whose actual size is much larger than shown.

It works nicely if your browser window is large enough for the blow up to actually appear larger than the embedded version. However when the browser is resized to a smaller window, the blow up has no difference in size and on some even smaller windows, the blow ups can be smaller than the embedded image.

Nowadays, if there's an image too small to read and the blow up doesn't help. I just right click the image and open it in a new tab so I can actually zoom in.

Before this feature, we used to be able to click on embedded images and it opens the source image in a new tab, and we're freely to zoom in with the mouse. It worked nicely regardless of browser sizes.

There should be a toggle perhaps.

04-Aug-2014 04:52:48 - Last edited on 04-Aug-2014 04:55:05 by Lifer

Quick find code: 261-262-33-65181208 Back to Top