Forums

Wilderness and Free Trade Vote Thread is locked

Quick find code: 254-255-49-62042278

Tormerch

Tormerch

Posts: 1 Bronze Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I see this as a new player/old player conflict. The game has lost some of it's hardiness with the removal of the wilderness. In the above someone stated that the wilderness was "the survival of the cunning." This is an excellent description of the wilderness. It IS your own choice to enter the wilderness.
I remember my first time playing RS back in 2004 or so, there was no warning for entering the wilderness-or I blatantly disregarded it- and I being the noob I was, wandered into it and got killed**
*** is different now, you have warnings for the wilderness, the new players are further educated. The thing that players must understand is that the wilderness is only as dangerous as you make it, there are less dangerous routes to get to such activities as Green Dragons, bone yard, hill giants, lessers, greaters and Mage Arena. The wilderness is where the mentally aware survive. We've all died there, we've all lost large amounts of money from dieing there. But it kept us coming back, whether it was to get revenge or the hope of some loot to cover our loses.
As to free trade, I only have small input. I used to love being able to give my friends presents, or even helping out somebody I did not know. My view on RWT is that if some idiots want to spend so much REAL money on attempt to gain a few mil or even a hundred mill on RS WITH the knowledge that they very well may be banned, let them. The GE should stay, but more variable fluctuation should occur in price changes, let the game live, let it breath. The economy is (should be) driven by the players. Scamming is minimal now, if a player is incapable of seeing a red exclamation point,they should find other habits besides trading.
Thanks for your time; may we have RS how it was once loved,
Tormerch

30-Dec-2010 15:35:39 - Last edited on 30-Dec-2010 15:36:59 by Tormerch

Sea Sah

Sea Sah

Posts: 270 Silver Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I don't object to Having the old wilderness and free trade back. I don't want to completely loose what we have now either.
-Have the old wilderness on designated worlds and the current one on others
-reinstate free trade but keep the G.E.

30-Dec-2010 15:37:18

Tropaeum
Dec Member 2023

Tropaeum

Posts: 928 Gold Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
The vote will most likely turn out with the "YES" group winning. There's no chance that it will turn around for a couple of reasons. One, people have been rioting for this for years. Two, people want the old RuneScape more than the new one.
And if it does turn out to be the "NO" group winning (which probably won't happen), everyone in RuneScape will be very angry and will start to insult RuneScape a lot (Jagex, "NO" group, ect.)
Remember, 90% vs 8%. Wonder who is going to win?
LIGHTSTAR

30-Dec-2010 15:37:36

Mylenes

Mylenes

Posts: 46 Bronze Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
For those who don't seem to understand wilderness level system;
Wilderness isn't a place where everyone can attack anyone. Also, wilderness isn't a place where you can attack +-10 level players everywhere.
Wilderness has levels from 1 to like 54-56 not sure anymore, it was 3 years ago anyways. If you stand on level 1, you can attack anyone who is 1 level higher or lower than you or someone who has same combat level as you. YOU CAN'T GET KILLED BY HIGH LEVEL MAGERS ON LOW LEVELS. Please, '08+ players, try to understand that. Thanks.

30-Dec-2010 15:38:28

The contents of this message have been hidden.

30-Dec-2010 15:39:43

Quick find code: 254-255-49-62042278 Back to Top