To above: People quitting => fewer people in Wilderness => fewer kills => less "stuff" for you.
-------------------------------
In the defense of Mainac Devil, I ask this:
How many F2Pers (or just players in general) have been with RuneScape long enough to know what the old Wilderness was like?
Answer: very few players, and nearly no F2Pers.
If anything, the only truly informed voters are players, like me, who are living time capsules from the old days. (I created this account in November of 2005.) ONLY VETERANS KNOW WHAT THE OLD WILDERNESS WAS LIKE, and certainly have a better idea than most of what things will be like if the old Wilderness is returned. Everyone else who hasn’t witnessed the old Wilderness and voted “Yes” has NO IDEA of the implications. IT’S LIKE VOTING FOR ONE CANDIDATE IN AN ELECTION BECAUSE YOU THINK THE OTHER CANDIDATE LOOKS UGLY. That is EXACTLY what is happening here.
Based on these facts, the only accurate vote would be allowing all accounts, F2P AND P2P, created before the removal of the old Wilderness to vote and barring all others. This would produce a clear picture as to whether removing the old Wilderness was the right thing since exactly ZERO VOTERS WOULD BE UNINFORMED about the realities of the old Wilderness. Veteran players would be able to make an objective decision as to which system is better. But, A MILLION UNINFORMED VOTERS, (literally) none of whom personally know what an unleashed Wilderness means, have been allowed to vote and DROWN OUT THE VETERANS’ VOICES.
I never thought the first vote was correctly executed. After reading my own words, I know that this second vote is also fundamentally flawed, and the heavily skewed results are showing this. I call for a more accurate vote and more details on the changes. (See my epic post on page 557.)
28-Dec-2010 15:54:45
- Last edited on
28-Dec-2010 15:58:12
by
BadEngineer