The thing that upsets me the most is that a great bunch of players who want the wilderness back automatically think the rest does too.
I've personally played since 2004. I went through the removal of traditional PK'ing and free trade. Like the vast majority of players, I was annoyed. But looking back, it turned out to be a lot worse than it is now.
Do the people shouting "Vote yes now OMG" actually think about the impact this will have on the game? Bringing the old wilderness back is (in my opinion) not too bad of an idea, but the results will be crazy. Items like dragon bones will rocket in price, wilderness quests would be very hard to complete . . . .
If you return free trade, the Grand Exchange will become deserted. You would have to spam "Buying" messages for hours to get items you need for a treasure trail, going through trade after trade until you find a decent offer. Scamming will return, Real World Trading would be simpler than ever, and this will encourage botters even more to try and earn real-life cash in virtual trades.
To all the yes voters: Think before you vote. Don't be impulsive. What was better before isn't necessarily better now.
P.S.: The voting system is completely bias. There is no option to vote against the proposed idea, one can use other players' names, and one name can vote multiple times. Also, the way the page looks now, having the 'Vote Now!' button automatically vote for Yes, that is false advertisement and is punishable by law, even if it is only for a game. Money is involved.
Copy & Paste this if you agree:
---------------------------
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
<><> NO TO FREE TRADE! <> NO TO THE WILDERNESS! <><>
<><><><><>< GIVE US WHO OPPOSE A VOICE! <><><><><><>
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
22-Dec-2010 16:46:19