@AgileLegend
"Idiots find it an easy was to pay large amounts of money and allow another players to kill them for an item."
-ok, that makes no sence at all. The more accurate claims for Wilderness bringing back RWT is that people BUY pk supplies from a RWT.
-People dont PAY large amounts to allow other players to kill them for an item. It would be easier to just trade.
-What you said is the reason why they didnt only get rid of trade limit, but why the wilderness had to go as well. It was an alternate to direct trade, just as staking was in duel areana.
"On the current PvP world you don't get all the items you're opponent dropped. That's good and all as it makes it much harder to RWT. If you removed either the unlimited trade or return the old wild, it's only logical RWT is going to sky rocket."
- Killing someone wearing 100mil gear and getting 100k loot is not "good and all", to put it simple, thats bs.
- When so many items are removed from the econemy, countless whips, barrows armour, dragon weapons, ect... it ruins the econemy, making prices unstable.
"So unlimited trade limit is just as bad as the old wild. Got that so far? As for my reasons I hate the wilderness and I don't care about the trade limit that can go either way. But seeing as the trade unlimited update will mess G.E. prices up. I don't want that either."
- G.E is run by merch clans. People manipulate manditory prices and people have to pay by how much the game says an item is worth.
- G.E is not leaving the game, and it will be useful for buying all the quest items you need all from one place, but it isn't good the way it's run now.
"Now tell me? What's wrong with me agreeing with "NO" to the Wild and unlimited trade?"
- I never said your wrong for voting "NO" i only wanted to know why you were against the wilderness returning. Which, by the way, isnt a good enough reason.
14-Jan-2011 19:33:40
- Last edited on
14-Jan-2011 19:35:07
by
JohneySteel