forums.rs

Forums

Wilderness and Free Trade Vote Thread is locked

Quick find code: 254-255-49-62042278

of 2094
Bake n Steak

Bake n Steak

Posts: 948 Gold Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Okay, I'm going to teach you how to read...
"So by that twisted and unfounded statement, i have managed to prove that people who vote against free trade and wilderness are in fact either women, or men that act like women..."
"So by that twisted and unfounded statement."
Okay, so in this line, i dismiss the statement after it by negating the validity of it. This means that I don't actually think that your a woman, but who are you to say that those on the other 1000 pages arn't?
So what I was doing was using flawed logic to try to show you the flaw in your logic.
The only argument that you ********'s have is that it will increase botting. So when we're trying to give you reasons for how stupid you are we like to provide counter arguments.
by mentioning botting we are not saying we support it, we are simply saying that we don't care, because all we want is the wilderness and free trade back.
Now stop pretending like you actually could possibly even have an infinitesimal point that is logical and valid against free trade and the wilderness.

03-Jan-2011 15:38:25 - Last edited on 03-Jan-2011 15:43:50 by Bake n Steak

MacGriogair
Aug Member 2023

MacGriogair

Posts: 1,293 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
RE: FredUp
Keplers Law if the game was so fine why did they change it?
A: They were ill-equipped to deal with the situation at the time and took measures into their own hands to the detriment of the game. It bought them time to tackle the problem better - time that they've used and obviously feel equipped enough to deal with the problem now.
what proof do i have there will be more bots i can say befroe the update there where loados of level 3 bots now theres not?
A: Again, this is a different time. Technology is a *ast advancing industry and software and coding are no exception to that. How can you compare the tech of 2006 with the tech of 2011? It astonishes me that you can even be so naive as to try and make me look silly here on that point.
Who is to say that these advancements have not helped curb the number of bots somewhat and thus you're seeing the difference as a result?
i can say half you admit you think bots are good?
A: You can say that but it doesn't make it true. You have no statistical evidence from which to support your claim and thus you're making a mockery of yourself by making said claim.
i can say more users = more chance of more bots
A: Just as I can say more users = more people having fun. More users = more people interacting together. Neither of us are factually correct as these are again just hypothesis.
what proof do you have that there won't be anymore?
A: I'm taking JaGeX for their word that they will be able to effectively stem the increase and fully trust in their competency to do so. I don't have proof, but then I'm not the one making rash claims and propaganda.
For someone who was *omplaining about a lack of decent debate regarding his points, this half-bothered attempt at a counter view is somewhat shocking and clearly lacking in any real scrutiny...

03-Jan-2011 15:38:37 - Last edited on 03-Jan-2011 15:40:18 by MacGriogair

Quick find code: 254-255-49-62042278 Back to Top