Forums

The worst weapon ever made.

Quick find code: 23-24-614-66216244

Loki Seijana
May Member 2021

Loki Seijana

Posts: 5,932 Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I suppose that's true about flails, they have some redeeming features. But I say that neither flails nor nunchucks are the worst weapons ever made, I say handgonnes were the worst for the reasons I gave before.

23-May-2021 15:06:03 - Last edited on 23-May-2021 15:06:46 by Loki Seijana

Wild Bill63

Wild Bill63

Posts: 2,947 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
@Loki sure in the beginning they were extremely limited and a bow was more efficient due to reload time and range. Over time though the gun was also developed so that we moved from breech-load, muzzle-load and flint lock to the powder being in a chamber of the brass.

23-May-2021 22:35:38

XSlay4DeathX
Mar Member 2007

XSlay4DeathX

Posts: 2,634 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I would say all guns/bombs, they have ZERO honour when it comes to skill and true combat. <--main reason i didn't join the military in this life time,

But i'm an ancient soul so i favour spear/sword combat. <---i know many combat moves that aren't even known in todays time period but when guns were designed many weapons never got advancements after that.

And regarding melee weapons being worst, depends on what your opponent is wearing.

Full armour suit was uncommon in battles i fought in other lives but heavier weapons to twist those helms or even just set the land on fire under them, landscapes had lots of tall grass in those days.

if you don't count honour (ability to block/ have a chance to win against it, for example a sniper, they see you and you don't know your dead in few minutes), There is nothing classed as 'worst weapon' as every weapon has it's pros/cons when against opponents.

My main vote would be nuclear bombs for overall worst, destroys land and life, defeats the purpose of winning a war to take over lands etc as you just poisoned it for 100+ years.

^those scare me

25-May-2021 00:34:26

Wild Bill63

Wild Bill63

Posts: 2,947 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
@Slay well combat is about surviving, not about honor. That means using any means necessary to defeat the enemy which is why guns were developed. Bows, swords, knives, and all of that reached their peak effectiveness since it's essentially a flexible stick with some sort of launching mechanism tied to either end. Once you make all of the improvements that can possibly be made it's time to up your game or you will get left behind and die. You don't care that a spider doesn't have a stick or a shoe to defend itself with and neither would you care that the enemy doesn't have a gun to defend itself. It's all about having the advantage in combat. The opposition won't care that you have a bow and arrow while they are using guns. It's just how the world works. Technology improves so people move on to more effective things.

If you get into a sketchy situation in combat you'll be forced to improvise, adapt and overcome the situation or die. If you've ever been in a paintball match you know it takes a good amount of skill to hit someone 100+ yards away while they are sprinting and there are trees in the way of your shot, on top of that it's hot and you're a bit shaky because you're excited and trying not to get shot. Then you have to use tactics and stealth, it all takes great skill. Now as far as honor in combat? There never was any. It's no more or less honorable to kill someone up close, it's just part of the job, particularly if you are infantry.

Also not every career in the military involves combat. My brother never left the states, he was military police in the Marines.

25-May-2021 19:05:15

Quick find code: 23-24-614-66216244 Back to Top