You cant watch a show like Ahohana by just watching it on a screen and staying detached from it. Even if you dont invest your emotion to the point were your going to cry at the ending, you still need to invest enough to understand WHY the CHARACTERS would.
--------------------------------------------------
Don’t assume that those who did*’t buy into Anohana were all unwilling to connect to the characters. I actually really like the first episode and a lot of other episodes. I felt for Anaru, Tsuruko, and sometimes Jintan. But Menma really ruined the show because it revolved around her. IMO, Anohana suffered because it often had to conform its tone and dialogue to Menma, a 14-15 year old, who acts like a 5 year old. I KNOW that she’s supposed to be stuck in her childhood mentality, but she was at least 8 years old when she died. There’s no excuse for Menma to be that badly written. It’s not hard to understand the character’s emotions/motivations, but it is difficult to accept them as not contrived.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
For example, do they see Yukiatsu as a cluster of lines and pixels who has a weird fetish and conforms to the 'love to hate' trope, or do they see him as an individual with his own thoughts and motivations who's burdened by his own ghosts of the past?
----------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, I kind of do see Yukiatsu as the standard “troubled good/bad guy.” Yet, I wouldn’t have a problem with that if he was fleshed out. Unfortunately, the writer limited him to shouting matches with Jintan and nightime shots of him sniffing reminders of Menma. I’ve cried in Clannad and Clannnad After Story and teared up in Cross Game and Bokura ga Ita (and I’m not even up to episode 10 in this one). So Anohana had a lot of chances to give more meaningful dialogue instead of tripe, clichéd monologues and montages. Those opportunities were squandered.
27-Jun-2011 08:26:28
- Last edited on
27-Jun-2011 08:34:43
by
h6h67h67h