Forums
Mandatory ID Requirement
Quick find code: 23-24-229-66207526
This is why you don't let other people use accounts that are in some body else's name...
I do very much believe that an ID system can still make people appropriately accountable.
It could simply add to evidential processes that already exist. People already get held accountable for things said online, but it can be harder to trace without ID. ID introduction makes this a lot easier. It can make the justice system work more effectively.
Edit: Having skim read through this thread, I am in general agreement with some posters.
ID can just be held on an encrypted system. It doesn't necessarily have to be held by the company that you're creating the account with. Could be linked to a more centralised system. It would be more useful for law enforcement purposes. Therefore even if someone got hacked, you wouldn't be able to access that type of info as it wouldn't be held by the company - it would be held where ID tends to already be held these days anyway. It is just that the central ID database that already exists also has other attachments to it such as login usernames for people.
Your username then forms part of your identity
As an aside note, Discord and P-r are scum websites. They are inappropriately managed. I would not step my feet there at all. Not everyone on Discord is bad, but there is a lot of inappropriate behaviour that can go on there due to the mechanisms and policies of that website. I would have no objections to server managers there being vetted.
I do very much believe that an ID system can still make people appropriately accountable.
It could simply add to evidential processes that already exist. People already get held accountable for things said online, but it can be harder to trace without ID. ID introduction makes this a lot easier. It can make the justice system work more effectively.
Edit: Having skim read through this thread, I am in general agreement with some posters.
ID can just be held on an encrypted system. It doesn't necessarily have to be held by the company that you're creating the account with. Could be linked to a more centralised system. It would be more useful for law enforcement purposes. Therefore even if someone got hacked, you wouldn't be able to access that type of info as it wouldn't be held by the company - it would be held where ID tends to already be held these days anyway. It is just that the central ID database that already exists also has other attachments to it such as login usernames for people.
Your username then forms part of your identity
As an aside note, Discord and P-r are scum websites. They are inappropriately managed. I would not step my feet there at all. Not everyone on Discord is bad, but there is a lot of inappropriate behaviour that can go on there due to the mechanisms and policies of that website. I would have no objections to server managers there being vetted.
14-Mar-2021 18:41:36 - Last edited on 14-Mar-2021 18:50:51 by Aeroxmaster
Aeroxmaster
said
:
This is why you don't let other people use accounts that are in some body else's name...
I do very much believe that an ID system can still make people appropriately accountable.
It could simply add to evidential processes that already exist. People already get held accountable for things said online, but it can be harder to trace without ID. ID introduction makes this a lot easier. It can make the justice system work more effectively.
Edit: Having skim read through this thread, I am in general agreement with some posters.
ID can just be held on an encrypted system. It doesn't necessarily have to be held by the company that you're creating the account with. Could be linked to a more centralised system. It would be more useful for law enforcement purposes. Therefore even if someone got hacked, you wouldn't be able to access that type of info as it wouldn't be held by the company - it would be held where ID tends to already be held these days anyway. It is just that the central ID database that already exists also has other attachments to it such as login usernames for people.
Your username then forms part of your identity
As an aside note, Discord and P-r are scum websites. They are inappropriately managed. I would not step my feet there at all. Not everyone on Discord is bad, but there is a lot of inappropriate behaviour that can go on there due to the mechanisms and policies of that website. I would have no objections to server managers there being vetted.
From someone in the world of public service, it just wholly wouldn't work like planned. Trust me I'd love it to, but it sadly wont.
I've noticed you post a lot of police related questions looking through history, are you related in some way or just have a keen interest/like to know peoples opinions? I've noticed you don't often post on your posts either
I only ask as obviously, I find them interesting and seeing others peoples point of view
This is why you don't let other people use accounts that are in some body else's name...
I do very much believe that an ID system can still make people appropriately accountable.
It could simply add to evidential processes that already exist. People already get held accountable for things said online, but it can be harder to trace without ID. ID introduction makes this a lot easier. It can make the justice system work more effectively.
Edit: Having skim read through this thread, I am in general agreement with some posters.
ID can just be held on an encrypted system. It doesn't necessarily have to be held by the company that you're creating the account with. Could be linked to a more centralised system. It would be more useful for law enforcement purposes. Therefore even if someone got hacked, you wouldn't be able to access that type of info as it wouldn't be held by the company - it would be held where ID tends to already be held these days anyway. It is just that the central ID database that already exists also has other attachments to it such as login usernames for people.
Your username then forms part of your identity
As an aside note, Discord and P-r are scum websites. They are inappropriately managed. I would not step my feet there at all. Not everyone on Discord is bad, but there is a lot of inappropriate behaviour that can go on there due to the mechanisms and policies of that website. I would have no objections to server managers there being vetted.
From someone in the world of public service, it just wholly wouldn't work like planned. Trust me I'd love it to, but it sadly wont.
I've noticed you post a lot of police related questions looking through history, are you related in some way or just have a keen interest/like to know peoples opinions? I've noticed you don't often post on your posts either
I only ask as obviously, I find them interesting and seeing others peoples point of view
I wish I liked Quests as much as I love AFKing
14-Mar-2021 18:58:15
Quick find code: 23-24-229-66207526 Back to Top