Fair enough. Though that term is CLEARLY used in jest, and anyone that takes offense to it really hasn't been exposed to the majority of the internet, I can see how that would be construed as offensive.
Problem solved. I simply won't use it. I fail to see why you insist on making my efforts to rejoin so difficult.
And of course it's semantics. But the point I'm trying to make here is that if your laws can't hold up to some verbal tests like this? They should probably be changed. I'm trying to help you out, so you can fix these laws and have them encompass more scenarios. I've been highlighting these issues in your rules for months, and they haven't changed. If you want me to stop raising stupid arguments like this, then don't provide me the loopholes. We really are after the same goal here.
And before you yell at me for monopolizing this thread, I would like to point out that I've offered to resolve this privately numerous times with you, but my efforts were rebuked.
06-Oct-2015 01:39:26
- Last edited on
06-Oct-2015 01:43:03
by
Mini Bar