I would like to make a complaint about the unfair and power abusive rank Lee m.
So after weeks of him targeting me specifically for temporary kicks whenever a rank needs to join *he literally always looks for my name* because he in his words "dislikes me" I finally decided to stand up and ask why he has to do this purely because of "disliking me"
Whaaaat.
I don't want to sound rude but seems rather irrational to get angry at Lee when he patiently and impatiently tried to explain this to you via cc.
The fc is consistently full and the game give priority to ranks because the limit is 100 people. When a rank joins the chat and its full, the system automatically boots out someone who isn't ranked. Whenever I'm on my alt, I seem to experience this multiple times an hour but I'm always able to get back in within a matter of minutes.
20-May-2016 19:41:34
- Last edited on
20-May-2016 19:45:27
by
Trips
I would like to make a complaint about the unfair and power abusive rank Lee m.
So after weeks of him targeting me specifically for temporary kicks whenever a rank needs to join *he literally always looks for my name* because he in his words "dislikes me" I finally decided to stand up and ask why he has to do this purely because of "disliking me"
Whaaaat.
I don't want to sound rude but seems rather irrational to get angry at Lee when he patiently and impatiently tried to explain this to you via cc.
The fc is consistently full and the game give priority to ranks because the limit is 100 people. When a rank joins the chat and its full, the system automatically boots out someone who isn't ranked. Whenever I'm on my alt, I seem to experience this multiple times an hour but I'm always able to get back in within a matter of minutes.
Good evening sir, every time i'm kicked out it say's i'm temporarily banned and unable to join for a long time
I have been in R Quark fc for over 2 years and never trolled or manip in the fc or thread. This is why a deserve a 2nd chance.
I need my blue charms back.
ELITE STACK
said
:
Am I still banned from the fc/cc?
It'll take a little while to show you've stopped trolling on forums before you're even considered a second thought, sorry.
I just wanted to put a small suggestion out there, it's a tiny thing which has been on my mind lately:
So currently the list for lowers is gween/bween/rween/rsh/bsh.
With the current price of bsh, I feel like it's something that would go better under the xmas category, so something like: mht/oht/scythe/wreath/bsh.
Given it is an xmas rare after all (even though it came one year earlier than the current xmas list?), I just feel like it doesn't really belong under the "lower" category, and it would make more sense under the xmas category.
I do understand that would mean both santa hats are on separate lists, but I personally feel like this would make more sense
.
Thanks for the read!
Insane Final Boss
- 4/11/17
22-May-2016 05:25:50
- Last edited on
22-May-2016 05:27:17
by
Raw
Raw
said
:
I just wanted to put a small suggestion out there, it's a tiny thing which has been on my mind lately:
So currently the list for lowers is gween/bween/rween/rsh/bsh.
With the current price of bsh, I feel like it's something that would go better under the xmas category, so something like: mht/oht/scythe/wreath/bsh.
Given it is an xmas rare after all (even though it came one year earlier than the current xmas list?), I just feel like it doesn't really belong under the "lower" category, and it would make more sense under the xmas category.
I do understand that would mean both santa hats are on separate lists, but I personally feel like this would make more sense
.
Thanks for the read!
While I do somewhat understand your point, I think that the FC users would prefer we kept it the way that it is. Having it in Lowers is what everyone is used to, and changing it now would likely cause some confusion. As it was released by itself in a one-off release, we assumed that it would be a one-time thing, and therefore just added it to lowers. When the Xmas items were then released, because there were multiple items, we were able to make an entirely new line for them. Going back, had we known perhaps we would have done it differently, but I don't think that it would be right to change it now from how it's been for so long.
Thanks for the feedback though!
~Hyles~
"The man who acquires the ability to take full possession of his own mind
may take possession of anything else to which he is justly entitled."