@Lyra, a few edits have been made for the above posts.
(New rules for updating ranges and valuing trades. I also realized that post #1.2 still said that purple, yellow, and green party hats were below max cash, so I updated that as well.)
If you quote my posts (the little grayed-out button to the bottom right of the post that looks like a speech bubble), you can copy and paste everything you need and keep all of the correct formatting.
Thanks!
~Hyles~
"The man who acquires the ability to take full possession of his own mind
may take possession of anything else to which he is justly entitled."
I feel like this is just reverting to no ranks need confirmations anymore. There have been multiple sketchy ranks in the past who took advantage of this. Might be better to keep the requirement where it is now imo.
@Hyles who doesn't know how to quote forum text??
19-May-2016 06:59:55
- Last edited on
19-May-2016 07:02:09
by
Trips
Trips
said
:
I feel like this is just reverting to no ranks need confirmations anymore. There have been multiple sketchy ranks in the past who took advantage of this. Might be better to keep the requirement where it is now imo.
@Hyles who doesn't know how to quote forum text??
I guess I see both sides of the argument. I'm completely fine with leaving it how it is if that would be preferred.
And you would be surprised Trips. Lyra couldn't even figure out how to turn the profanity filter off in-game. It was very entertaining trying to help her figure it out - she's been away from the game too long.
~Hyles~
"The man who acquires the ability to take full possession of his own mind
may take possession of anything else to which he is justly entitled."
~Andrew Carnegie
19-May-2016 19:04:29
- Last edited on
19-May-2016 19:05:06
by
Hyles
Trips
said
:
I feel like this is just reverting to no ranks need confirmations anymore. There have been multiple sketchy ranks in the past who took advantage of this. Might be better to keep the requirement where it is now imo.
@Hyles who doesn't know how to quote forum text??
It's not hard to know if trades are being faked. I'm not a fan of the system we have now. Now we have star + and a trusted ranks list. I rather have a rule without exceptions. Much easier and easier for non-ranks.
'•Party Hat ranges require a minimum of 5 confirmed trades to update.'
However i wish this was true, we still need 10, but sometimes admins do 7-10 too if an update is really needed. But the official rule is still 10.
And when we have 3 out of range trades we use the 5 older trades to make a new range (The last 5).
Oh and maybe add this too:
Trades not posted within 24 hours will be ignored cuz this is manipulation.
Trades posted within 24 hours but confirmed later will still be used.
I made these edits:
Hyles
said
:
•Trades must be reported within 24 hours of the transaction and confirmed by both parties to be used in the range discussion. Reports that have been given by ranks (1 stripe+) do not require confirmation, however, we ask that an effort is made to receive confirmation.
•Party Hat ranges require a minimum of 7 confirmed trades to update. The only exception to this is if there are 3 confirmed trades that are outside of the current range, in which case a new range may be made using confirmed trades from the previous range discussion. Admins may use discretion on how many trades are required.
I increased the number of required trades to 7 rather than 10, because generally we update with fewer anyways due to the recent volatility. Ultimately it is up to the admin how many trades are required, which is why that last sentence "Admins may use discretion on how many trades are required." is the key part of that rule.
~Hyles~
"The man who acquires the ability to take full possession of his own mind
may take possession of anything else to which he is justly entitled."
I would like to make a complaint about the unfair and power abusive rank Lee m.
So after weeks of him targeting me specifically for temporary kicks whenever a rank needs to join *he literally always looks for my name* because he in his words "dislikes me" I finally decided to stand up and ask why he has to do this purely because of "disliking me"
I feel kicking someone for no other reason then that is immature, unfair and unprofessional, I expected better from an r quark rank.
Of course standing up and asking him why he has to do this lead to me immediately being kicked from the CC by him.
I feel it's power abuse for him to do this purely because he "dislikes me* and I've seen him be equally harsh and unprofessional to others too.
With his actions I wouldn't be surprised if he set's me up, or others to be on the KOS list.
I would like to make a complaint about the unfair and power abusive rank Lee m.
So after weeks of him targeting me specifically for temporary kicks whenever a rank needs to join *he literally always looks for my name* because he in his words "dislikes me" I finally decided to stand up and ask why he has to do this purely because of "disliking me"
I feel kicking someone for no other reason then that is immature, unfair and unprofessional, I expected better from an r quark rank.
Of course standing up and asking him why he has to do this lead to me immediately being kicked from the CC by him.
I feel it's power abuse for him to do this purely because he "dislikes me* and I've seen him be equally harsh and unprofessional to others too.
With his actions I wouldn't be surprised if he set's me up, or others to be on the KOS list.
Thankyou for your time
For the 100th time you were not kicked from the fc, a rank joined and you were RANDOMLY removed by the GAME to make space for that rank.
I kicked you from the CC after giving you multiple warnings to stop with your childish and immature attitude towards other users of the CC. Stop playing the victim, it's beyond pathetic.
465798359gjk
said
:
Welcome to the club Fluffy Dream
It's shocking that you have the gall to come back to this thread and play the victim once again. You deserve absolutely everything that came to you and so much more.
I was just trying to point out an apparent recurring theme in a subtle manner to be perfectly honest. I continue to be interested in the FC and for it's good. I think all too often the FC makes it's own enemies with the way ranks conduct themselves. Just saying...