forums.rs

Forums

Land Claims of World 31 T5

Quick find code: 90-91-646-65461586

of 107
Cairo Saepio

Cairo Saepio

Posts: 2,616 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Znk Alliance said :
I'm a little shocked that no one else finds it absurd to wager land.... Since when does an Attacking army stop at the enemy border and offer their land as token should the attack fail? If the battle were a grudge match to decide who the strongest was, I would understand, but this concept during a waged war makes absolutely no sense to me at all.


Oh no, we find it a bit silly, that's why KASH voted no

Like when in history has a nation ever faught another nation and then lost land for losing the attacking battle. Yes maybe a counter attack, but that would be a different fight.
Cairo Saepio
|
Priest of Saradomin

10-Sep-2014 01:59:20 - Last edited on 10-Sep-2014 02:00:25 by Cairo Saepio

AngryAraxxor

AngryAraxxor

Posts: 4,793 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I agree it doesn't make much sense from a roleplay perspective, but from a fair play perspective I would say having to stake your land is justified. Also makes it less likely for clans to go out on a frenzy attacking people when they have something at stake themselves. ¸¸¸¸¸¸„‹•°Member of
Shuu Zone #1 Community Clan
°•›„¸¸¸¸¸
AngryAraxxor
|
38/46 Insane Final Boss
|
PvPer
PvMer
Community
man

10-Sep-2014 02:07:23 - Last edited on 10-Sep-2014 02:07:38 by AngryAraxxor

Bowie I
Mar Member 2016

Bowie I

Posts: 5,390 Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
W31 Poll Scheme

Majority vote is needed to pass this.

I'm calling for a vote of adding a rule to War declaration. In order to declare war, you must stake a land in order to attempt to take a land. Unless Both parties(The Declarer and the defender) agree upon something else.

Please note, if passed; it will not effect the current war between KASH and KOZ.

Yes
------------------------------
Lord Bowie I
Infernal Phoenix
Ellaria
Black Bone


No
------------------------------
Kingdom of Ashdale
Cairo (currently banned from forums for drawing an obscene image on forums lol)

Current Vote is 5-3.


EDIT: This is why we call Cairo/Youyou The Supreme Imbecile. Rofl
Legatus Maximus
|
The Empire of Zaros - RS3

10-Sep-2014 02:23:56 - Last edited on 10-Sep-2014 03:00:13 by Bowie I

Cairo Saepio

Cairo Saepio

Posts: 2,616 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
AngryAraxxor said :
I agree it doesn't make much sense from a roleplay perspective, but from a fair play perspective I would say having to stake your land is justified. Also makes it less likely for clans to go out on a frenzy attacking people when they have something at stake themselves.

If they went on a frenzy attacking people, I'm fairly sure they would get attacked by the community and lose their claims anyways.
Cairo Saepio
|
Priest of Saradomin

10-Sep-2014 03:11:04

Jor Ulfrsson

Jor Ulfrsson

Posts: 6,288 Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Znk Alliance said :
I'm a little shocked that no one else finds it absurd to wager land.... Since when does an Attacking army stop at the enemy border and offer their land as token should the attack fail? If the battle were a grudge match to decide who the strongest was, I would understand, but this concept during a waged war makes absolutely no sense to me at all.


*the siege on the city commences*

General: Halt! Wait! wait..! One moment!
*siege stops*
*general signals the white banner and begins to approach the city gates*
General: Ho, there!
Captain of the gate: Swine! What do you want?
General: I forgot to mention. If we are defeated in this battle, you are welcome to a portion of our land.
Captain of the gate: Oh. Okay. I shall inform my authority.
General: Thank you for your custom.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


No. We find ourselves at the end of our amusements.

10-Sep-2014 03:16:59

Tahmid 1100
Jun Member 2021

Tahmid 1100

Posts: 11,739 Opal Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
alot of things on this thread doesnt follow the usual norms.. just accept it.. when you try to fight it, people get mad Znk Alliance said :
I'm a little shocked that no one else finds it absurd to wager land.... Since when does an Attacking army stop at the enemy border and offer their land as token should the attack fail? If the battle were a grudge match to decide who the strongest was, I would understand, but this concept during a waged war makes absolutely no sense to me at all. cake owner

10-Sep-2014 03:42:53

Tahmid 1100
Jun Member 2021

Tahmid 1100

Posts: 11,739 Opal Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
also the white knights control falador.. and the zarosians want it and the ashdales wana protect it.. i dont get why lands need to be staked its just an attack and defending battle where the winner goes home and has a party and the looser crys.

if anything land stake should come up if the war was between the white knights and the zaros. to keep things balanced and theres not alot of pointless wars. other than that dont see the point

with that being said from personal expireances i was told to declare war for a certain land you would also need to give up one of your land if you lost.. not sure if i was told that so they can get rid of me or playing me like a fool because im new to the runescape rp scene. but since i believe in real rping ill be voting no the poll cake owner

10-Sep-2014 03:44:44 - Last edited on 10-Sep-2014 03:52:36 by Tahmid 1100

Tahmid 1100
Jun Member 2021

Tahmid 1100

Posts: 11,739 Opal Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
W31 Poll Scheme

Majority vote is needed to pass this.

I'm calling for a vote of adding a rule to War declaration. In order to declare war, you must stake a land in order to attempt to take a land. Unless Both parties(The Declarer and the defender) agree upon something else.

Please note, if passed; it will not effect the current war between KASH and KOZ.

Yes
------------------------------



No
------------------------------
tahmid 1100 cake owner

10-Sep-2014 03:46:37

AngryAraxxor

AngryAraxxor

Posts: 4,793 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Cairo Saepio said :
AngryAraxxor said :
I agree it doesn't make much sense from a roleplay perspective, but from a fair play perspective I would say having to stake your land is justified. Also makes it less likely for clans to go out on a frenzy attacking people when they have something at stake themselves.

If they went on a frenzy attacking people, I'm fairly sure they would get attacked by the community and lose their claims anyways.
That is true, I was thinking of that while I wrote this but couldn't be bothered to correct myself.

I stick to the first part of my message though, after all even the most "serious" roleplaying is technically still a game, and a game needs to have mechanics. I think staking land for land is a fair and fun mechanic that should be in place if it wasn't there already (all wars I remember were already done this way though). There we go :P ¸¸¸¸¸¸„‹•°Member of
Shuu Zone #1 Community Clan
°•›„¸¸¸¸¸
AngryAraxxor
|
38/46 Insane Final Boss
|
PvPer
PvMer
Community
man

10-Sep-2014 04:07:26

Quick find code: 90-91-646-65461586 Back to Top