Forums

Nex and SS FC Home Thread is locked

Quick find code: 90-91-466-65607736

JDogg

JDogg

Posts: 6,876 Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
The Old NaS thread

page 6, post 7-8

page 7, post 1

page 8, post 9.

These are the posts that got my interests, the idea and people involved. This thread is currently on page 8, and will be around for several months for our viewing and creative absorbance.

Also, as we are praising these people I don't think any of this falls under "name and shame" rule, however, if it does I would appreciate it if a Forum Moderator would please inform us. Thanks!

Again, the rank changes happened now due the current cycle ending. Feedback is welcome ;)
Road to 5.4!

29-May-2015 23:19:22

Charter
Dec Member 2007

Charter

Posts: 2,036 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Okay, whilst I think it's okay to give smiley ranks out like this, and that is fully acceptable to me, I certainly don't agree that a kick rank should be given out on such a basis - I personally feel you should either demote Glotz or make kickrank back to stars - you're setting a very dangerous precedence if you're going to give kickranks out on subjective grounds; giving reports in the fc in my opinion, whilst of course being helpful, does not warrant a rank to kick lol. Again this is nothing personal against Glotz as I agree his reports have been helpful - but definitely like I said, this does not warrant a kickrank.

30-May-2015 11:48:07 - Last edited on 30-May-2015 11:50:39 by Charter

JDogg

JDogg

Posts: 6,876 Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Rufoo said :
I'd like to support Charter in this. Could you please slow down with cutting decisions and promoting so fast, JDogg? I appreciate all the work you do for the FC really - but everything at it's time please.


I do see what you're saying. I think we can see each situation as a case by case basis on this subject. There is no "X-amount of updates given" to be rank, rather by the quality and community support and recognition. There will be some adjustments made going forward, as some people evidently were promoted too fast.
Road to 5.4!

30-May-2015 14:35:12

The contents of this message have been hidden.

30-May-2015 16:31:45

The contents of this message have been hidden.

30-May-2015 16:59:32

Charter
Dec Member 2007

Charter

Posts: 2,036 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
VIP Tom said :
Hidden a couple of posts for flaming others. If you have nothing nice to say, then do not say it at all.


K.

Edit: The saying is actually: If you have nothing nice to say, then say nothing at all.

30-May-2015 21:16:09 - Last edited on 30-May-2015 21:17:27 by Charter

Utmost
Nov Member 2018

Utmost

Posts: 1,328 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Charter said :
Okay, whilst I think it's okay to give smiley ranks out like this, and that is fully acceptable to me, I certainly don't agree that a kick rank should be given out on such a basis - I personally feel you should either demote Glotz or make kickrank back to stars - you're setting a very dangerous precedence if you're going to give kickranks out on subjective grounds; giving reports in the fc in my opinion, whilst of course being helpful, does not warrant a rank to kick lol. Again this is nothing personal against Glotz as I agree his reports have been helpful - but definitely like I said, this does not warrant a kickrank.

Hey, Glotz can be trusted Charter.

No fair, why does Diggles get a free smiley, I want one too!!!
But you will remember me
Remember me
For centuries...

31-May-2015 04:36:23

Quick find code: 90-91-466-65607736 Back to Top