forums.rs

Forums

Nex and SS FC Home Thread is locked

Quick find code: 90-91-466-65607736

of 59
JDogg

JDogg

Posts: 6,876 Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Rufoo said :
In response to Charter in the Nex and SS V13 thread on page 104:

Original message details are unavailable.
But that's an old use of the system lol, if someone imbed at 20 flat you'd make it <20 not <20.5, so why would it be any different? you're misleading people by suggesting 19.5 inb is <20, it's under 19.5, 500k is a big difference in today's market :3

Ps. This is why it was ridiculous to take out the RANGES, which is what - is, it's not a margin whatever you lot try and say, lol.
You're right on the first part, but as nobody spoke to me before about it, I have pced the way I used to do so. I would've changed the way I PC'ed for sure if someone noticed me about it.

It wasn't much but there was 3 days time to discuss removing ranges from the FC. The .5 update happened in April, and we removed ranges and ~/* based on your idea. There was no need for a poll if only two people are using it. Road to 5.4!

22-Sep-2015 19:43:12

Charter
Dec Member 2007

Charter

Posts: 2,036 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Alright yeah you're right I did say to make it a b/s thing so I hold my hands up, but inb on 19.5 would be <19.5 still i'm sure Rufoo, just round up/down to nearest .5 of a mil and if it's flat use the number it's on

22-Sep-2015 20:00:47

Rufoo

Rufoo

Posts: 882 Gold Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Charter said :
Alright yeah you're right I did say to make it a b/s thing so I hold my hands up, but inb on 19.5 would be <19.5 still i'm sure Rufoo, just round up/down to nearest .5 of a mil and if it's flat use the number it's on
My apologies. I'll make sure to PC this way from now on. Thanks for getting back at me. Trouble shoot Nex and SS FC: Click here
Previously known as: rubNN, MeneerWortel, Ruf* the Ufo.

22-Sep-2015 21:29:44 - Last edited on 22-Sep-2015 21:29:57 by Rufoo

Charter
Dec Member 2007

Charter

Posts: 2,036 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Before I probably get shot down for this but, I must just say, after pcing for this fc for the first time in God knows how long, is it not worth simply changing to b/s? lol, like the new system is fine, like you believe that is the way forward and so I support that, but it is simply b/s rounded to the nearest .5, and so for the sake of making it easier for the pcer and also I guess to fall in line with other pcing fc's, would it not be worth just changing to b/s? Honestly there remains no reason now to keep the +/< symbol's with no ranges,
Charter.

03-Oct-2015 00:57:36

JDogg

JDogg

Posts: 6,876 Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Charter said :
Before I probably get shot down for this but, I must just say, after pcing for this fc for the first time in God knows how long, is it not worth simply changing to b/s? lol, like the new system is fine, like you believe that is the way forward and so I support that, but it is simply b/s rounded to the nearest .5, and so for the sake of making it easier for the pcer and also I guess to fall in line with other pcing fc's, would it not be worth just changing to b/s? Honestly there remains no reason now to keep the +/< symbol's with no ranges,
Charter.


Charter said :
I personally am against the b/s ... The only poll I actually cared about was B/S and you guys all voted against it. With the FC being cozy as it is now, there's not really any point in an immense change this late in the game. All these months later, why not embrace our uniqueness and stick to it.


Rufoo said :
I do wish to add that allowing offtopic has previously always been up to the PCer and certainly shouldn't be the thing where we outstand other PCing chats. The thing we should be proud of is our very own price checking system and exactly THAT is why we should not - never - change to a different system other PCing chats use. #rufoonation Road to 5.4!

03-Oct-2015 03:28:06

Charter
Dec Member 2007

Charter

Posts: 2,036 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Fair enough

Edit; Just to say, not to make a deal out of it or anything, but what you're quoting was said by myself when the fc still used ranges and so I still felt like b/s wasn't applicable to the fc

Another edit: Thank you for unbanning me lol

03-Oct-2015 04:09:07 - Last edited on 03-Oct-2015 15:12:14 by Charter

Rufoo

Rufoo

Posts: 882 Gold Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Page 111 of Nex and SS v14.
Original message details are unavailable.
You could just not take those updates like many of the other forum reports that you don't bother include in yur updates Original message details are unavailable.
Just to say, you do realise after you decided to remove ranges from this fc, that you actually do use the b/s system, just without the b/s, so him reporting it like that is no different from the +/< that the fc now uses, and i'm also pretty sure he can report it however he likes lol, the forums aren't controlled by the fc. Don't worry buddies, I wasn't making him believe I'm controlling the forum whatsoever. I asked him kindly to post updates properly, meaning stating the exact or rounded price. Actually I only told him we're not using the b/s system here and everyone knows that, because it's common sense. Trouble shoot Nex and SS FC: Click here
Previously known as: rubNN, MeneerWortel, Ruf* the Ufo.

03-Oct-2015 18:19:47 - Last edited on 03-Oct-2015 18:22:19 by Rufoo

Quick find code: 90-91-466-65607736 Back to Top