Hupw
said
:
@Blackwing
An option for me to toggle what state of growth other people's legendary pets appears to me and me alone would solve this problem without affecting any other player or the player with the pet in any way shape or form. I have never and will never purchase a pet like this, but that doesn't seem to be changing anything.
@Blackwing
An option for me to toggle what state of growth other people's legendary pets appears to me and me alone would solve this problem without affecting any other player or the player with the pet in any way shape or form. I have never and will never purchase a pet like this, but that doesn't seem to be changing anything.
1. Look, I get it, you don't personally care about whether others see your stuff or not, and that's fine, but there are people who do care whether their stuff is shown to everyone around them or not; otherwise Jagex wouldn't have made cosmetics that draw more attention, since their aim with MTX is to sell it as much as possible. To say that those people wouldn't be affected by a toggle like that is false; it influenced their purchasing decision, without which they might not have made the purchase (for some it was crucial, others saw it as a plus).
2. I don't think you understood what I meant by voting with your wallet here, so to clarify: since you're still a paying member (and a premier member to boot), in Jagex's eyes, despite your complaints about the pets, you're still fine with them. Otherwise, you wouldn't have renewed your subscription, let alone paid for a year's worth in advance, because the trolls at portables are hardly a new thing, so you've had the opportunity to vote with your wallet like that already, but did not. And since you did not, because there are people paying money for those cosmetics, in Jagex's eyes it's the best move for them to not add a toggle, since they get your money already without it, and they can get even more money from new cosmetic purchases.
3. A small addition to #2, even though you now say "I never have and never will buy this stuff", in Jagex's eyes, they think they'll be able to change that in the future, to still be able to persuade you into buying them. It's the same reason why non-ironmen can't opt-out from TH, despite wanting to.
2. I don't think you understood what I meant by voting with your wallet here, so to clarify: since you're still a paying member (and a premier member to boot), in Jagex's eyes, despite your complaints about the pets, you're still fine with them. Otherwise, you wouldn't have renewed your subscription, let alone paid for a year's worth in advance, because the trolls at portables are hardly a new thing, so you've had the opportunity to vote with your wallet like that already, but did not. And since you did not, because there are people paying money for those cosmetics, in Jagex's eyes it's the best move for them to not add a toggle, since they get your money already without it, and they can get even more money from new cosmetic purchases.
3. A small addition to #2, even though you now say "I never have and never will buy this stuff", in Jagex's eyes, they think they'll be able to change that in the future, to still be able to persuade you into buying them. It's the same reason why non-ironmen can't opt-out from TH, despite wanting to.
"Volat Accipiter libera est; venandi sua natura est."
~Accipiter striatus
02-May-2019 04:34:21