Make it however that they cannot be the same type of ring
Eg - cant mix two rings that give crit in the same type, so no zerker and 6th age but a warrior and seers is ok.
No zerk + warrior as they both give melee
Not double Row as this would also be op.
Not double vigor as it would be op.
Two rings that dont give the same bouns so you can get two benefits but not stackable ones
Option 1.5 has no restrictions but crit and armor boosts would NOT stack, and the higher value would simply override the lower one. For example, wearing a Seer (i) and onyx (i) gives you 3% mage, 2.7% range/melee crit and 23 armor, and wearing two onyx (i) rings would be the same as wearing one.
Special effects of rings like wealth, vigor, or leviathan would not stack either.
The fact that some geniuses were laughed at does not imply that all who are laughed at are geniuses. They laughed at Columbus, Fulton, and the Wright brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown.
SUPPORT! Never really thought about this at all tbh, but one on each ring finger is definitely a great choice. During Vorago i always bring a leviathan and a vigour, and almost always forgot to switch to vigour for ults, or back to lev after i use it. Would really love having the ability to use both and not have to worry about the switches
I support the dual ring ideas and honestly I wouldn't mind if you could stack the bonuses from them either. I really only care because I like wearing my Sixth Age circuit ring for slayer, but I bring my ring of wealth incase I want to swap them out and try to get some decent drops.
thanks
The fact that some geniuses were laughed at does not imply that all who are laughed at are geniuses. They laughed at Columbus, Fulton, and the Wright brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown.
bump
The fact that some geniuses were laughed at does not imply that all who are laughed at are geniuses. They laughed at Columbus, Fulton, and the Wright brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown.