i think that the ring of charos and ring of visibilty should be permanantly equiped like in a toolbelt of sorts and that you can weild two or even three combat rings at once (im all for generous benefits as long as it isn't gamebreakingly OP)
Yes I would like to be able to wear my slayer ring or a ring of wealth and also a combat ring..... I'm not sure about wearing two combat rings though.. but I guess the critical % is less of a big deal than the strength boost used to be.
I do like the idea of combining items though... I always have done.... the slayer helmet for example was a great addition to the game. It was really useful to be able to wear both a black mask and a facemask. The cramulet is a really good idea too, although not actually that useful in normal gameplay.
I wish we could combine a ring of slaying with a combat ring.. to use the combat ring's stats but the slayer ring's other abilities.
I'd also like to be able to combine other items that have useful functions with ones that have decent armour or other stats....
Elder Dragon
said
:
i think that the ring of charos and ring of visibilty should be permanantly equiped like in a toolbelt of sorts and that you can weild two or even three combat rings at once (im all for generous benefits as long as it isn't gamebreakingly OP)
They did something similar to the ghostspeak amulet where after the Morytania tasks you could talk to ghosts without wearing it. It would be nice if they did the same with those two rings.
The fact that some geniuses were laughed at does not imply that all who are laughed at are geniuses. They laughed at Columbus, Fulton, and the Wright brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown.
Support for one combat and one noncombat. I'm concerned that if they aren't limited as such, we'll start seeing people with double Onyx Ring (i)'s, 6th Age Circuit+Onyx Ring (i), or Onyx Ring (i) and Berserker Ring (i). Part way into this thread, I also read something about a bracelet slot. I'd support one, but I'm concerned that two would be overpowered.
Bracelets do very little now. Not to mention they're completely statless. But you're right that we wouldn't need a 2nd bracelet slot, at least with the current selection.
The fact that some geniuses were laughed at does not imply that all who are laughed at are geniuses. They laughed at Columbus, Fulton, and the Wright brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown.
Just yesterday I was pondering how our characters are so functional despite only having one finger. I don't slayer much anymore (99), but it pains me to choose between a RoW, Ferocious ring and my Sixth-Age Circuit.
It is a tough choice sometimes unless you want to sacrifice 1-2 inv spaces and keep switching rings, but that's a pain to do.
The fact that some geniuses were laughed at does not imply that all who are laughed at are geniuses. They laughed at Columbus, Fulton, and the Wright brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown.
Maybe they're custom made to fit ring fingers only, which makes the limit two. This assumes of course your ring fingers are roughly the same size and you still have both of them.
The fact that some geniuses were laughed at does not imply that all who are laughed at are geniuses. They laughed at Columbus, Fulton, and the Wright brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown.