Forums
• Players vs. F-Mods! • (V33)
Quick find code: 55-56-549-66249521
Destruction
said
:
We saw this balance when you and other person started couting today. It got to -25 including all 3 of us against in couple of minutes which is wrong.
And that right there is my issue with the counting disparity. If a player and an FMod alternate posts for just a single page, then the FMods gain 10 points of advantage despite the fact that both sides contributed the same number of posts (5). For the record, it took us about 5 hours of uninterrupted posting to reach the 30s. It didn't even take an hour to undo that. And again, that was with both sides posting about evenly.
Destruction said :
Like I've said, I'd like to hear what Idiotest have to say on 00:00 and I'm not the most
Were I the thread creator, I would remove the resets as well. It is not a fun or exciting rule, and as it stands, it is used primarily by the "losing" side to force a sort of stalemate. In the cases where double posts and :00s have happened incidentally, it's been more of a nuisance than the "oops lol" that is advertised. And these incidental posts happen often enough such that they really shouldn't have such a significant impact on the game.
If we have to keep the rule, though, I would suggest the following alteration: If a player :00s or double posts, then the count decreases by 5. Likewise, if an FMod :00s or double posts, then the count increases by 5. In the event such posts would push the count past ±50, then it results in an automatic win for the relevant team. Still a nuisance, but no longer prone to abuse, and more in line with the "oops lol" mentality.
-24
We saw this balance when you and other person started couting today. It got to -25 including all 3 of us against in couple of minutes which is wrong.
And that right there is my issue with the counting disparity. If a player and an FMod alternate posts for just a single page, then the FMods gain 10 points of advantage despite the fact that both sides contributed the same number of posts (5). For the record, it took us about 5 hours of uninterrupted posting to reach the 30s. It didn't even take an hour to undo that. And again, that was with both sides posting about evenly.
Destruction said :
Like I've said, I'd like to hear what Idiotest have to say on 00:00 and I'm not the most
Were I the thread creator, I would remove the resets as well. It is not a fun or exciting rule, and as it stands, it is used primarily by the "losing" side to force a sort of stalemate. In the cases where double posts and :00s have happened incidentally, it's been more of a nuisance than the "oops lol" that is advertised. And these incidental posts happen often enough such that they really shouldn't have such a significant impact on the game.
If we have to keep the rule, though, I would suggest the following alteration: If a player :00s or double posts, then the count decreases by 5. Likewise, if an FMod :00s or double posts, then the count increases by 5. In the event such posts would push the count past ±50, then it results in an automatic win for the relevant team. Still a nuisance, but no longer prone to abuse, and more in line with the "oops lol" mentality.
-24
¸,•°´
`°•¸
Idiotest of
......
,›°°·'
.
,.¸
Casual Escape
......
'›,¸¸,'
.
`›,¸
¸,'
10-Apr-2022 01:57:02 - Last edited on 10-Apr-2022 01:58:09 by Idiotest
Kathy
said
:
So an example of the :00 reset rule applying to the winning side:
P1: 1
P2: 2
P3: 3 (posts :00 time stamp) - this would reset the count to zero
P1: 1 Am I right in thinking it would set the count to -8, not 0?
-26 Life is like a camera: Just focus on what's important, capture the good times, develop from the negatives, and if things don't work out, take another shot !
So an example of the :00 reset rule applying to the winning side:
P1: 1
P2: 2
P3: 3 (posts :00 time stamp) - this would reset the count to zero
P1: 1 Am I right in thinking it would set the count to -8, not 0?
-26 Life is like a camera: Just focus on what's important, capture the good times, develop from the negatives, and if things don't work out, take another shot !
10-Apr-2022 05:55:42
Corder
said
:
Am I right in thinking it would set the count to -8, not 0?
-26
In the above example, if it had been F-Mod who posted the :00, then it would be -8. However, because the players are winning, the :00 posted by a player would effectively reset the count to 0.
So to recap:
- If players are winning and one of them posts a :00 - the count is reset to 0
- If players are winning and a F-Mod posts a :00 - the count is reduced by 10. Inversely, if the F-Mods are winning and a player posts a :00, they get to ADD 10 (since fmods count the opposite direction)
Hope that makes sense.
---
-29
Am I right in thinking it would set the count to -8, not 0?
-26
In the above example, if it had been F-Mod who posted the :00, then it would be -8. However, because the players are winning, the :00 posted by a player would effectively reset the count to 0.
So to recap:
- If players are winning and one of them posts a :00 - the count is reset to 0
- If players are winning and a F-Mod posts a :00 - the count is reduced by 10. Inversely, if the F-Mods are winning and a player posts a :00, they get to ADD 10 (since fmods count the opposite direction)
Hope that makes sense.
---
-29
• Kathy •
Forum Help Sticky
|
Sailor Neptune
|
Forum Community Helper
10-Apr-2022 06:22:07 - Last edited on 10-Apr-2022 06:23:30 by Kathy
Yep thanks
-28 Life is like a camera: Just focus on what's important, capture the good times, develop from the negatives, and if things don't work out, take another shot !
-28 Life is like a camera: Just focus on what's important, capture the good times, develop from the negatives, and if things don't work out, take another shot !
10-Apr-2022 06:29:27
-26
¸,•°´
`°•¸
Idiotest of
......
,›°°·'
.
,.¸
Casual Escape
......
'›,¸¸,'
.
`›,¸
¸,'
10-Apr-2022 11:22:04
1
¸,•°´
`°•¸
Idiotest of
......
,›°°·'
.
,.¸
Casual Escape
......
'›,¸¸,'
.
`›,¸
¸,'
10-Apr-2022 11:44:16
Quick find code: 55-56-549-66249521 Back to Top