forums.rs

Forums

• Players vs. F-Mods! • (V33)

Quick find code: 55-56-549-66249521

of 200
Kathy
May
fmod Member
2011

Kathy

Forum Moderator Posts: 20,217 Opal Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Corder said :
snip

Thanks for your feedback. That is basically my line of thinking. :)

Destruction said :
Incorrect. I had proofs of certain person heavily abusing the rules that you made.
I tried writing like a normal human being but I got accused by the same person and that person was clearly wrong, the proofs literally in the thread that everyone saw.

The problem here is you are indirectly accusing someone, which is not welcome on forums. Sorry that sounds "robotic" but it's the simple reality. My question to you is/was - how would YOU improve the game? What would YOU like to see changed. To do that, you don't need to place an accusation, indirectly nor otherwise. I actually changed the rules around plenty of times when the :00 timer was being abused. It wasn't received positively and it was changed further. After a while, it was reverted to the original rule with the asterisk of possibility of it being changed if it was abused.

So I ask again, what would YOU like to see changed within the current scope of the game rules? That's something that can be answered without the whole indirect accusing you did above.
__

-11
• Kathy •


Forum Help Sticky
|
Sailor Neptune
|
Forum Community Helper

09-Apr-2022 20:13:35 - Last edited on 09-Apr-2022 20:14:03 by Kathy

Destruction

Destruction

Posts: 63,021 Emerald Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
But when I got accused you didn't care and you didn't write any of this. I guess that is welcomed on forums, depends who writes it? No discrimination, please.
I am literally writing like this because I got accused of something that never happened. I don't want to allow other people to stomp over me and that will never change.
I was going to say what I would like to see it changed but 1st time thread got locked so we could not express ourself and 2nd time someone indirectly threatened me so I couldn't say as there was no way.
Thanks for finally allowing someone to say what they think even though we got ignored so many times at the beggining. Maybe we should somehow ask all those people that left because of prior heavy abuse? I mean you can set the rules but if you're not gonna follow it the same things will happen.
I don't want to speak for everyone all the time and I want to hear what Idiotest has to say, she is one of rare people that have healthy, normal suggestions and she is the most active here with me, by far. Her voice is very valuable, atleast to me.

My suggestions would be lowering fmod counts from 3 to 2 but this can be debated if you put some sort of spam-protect, then 3 is perfectly fine. Fmods can win in like 2 minutes by this, not counting abuses from before. Double posting shouldn't reset the thread if it's really an accident because this got abused heavily before, the most I believe. When it comes to 00:00 I'm not sure what to say, I mean it could stay but I'd really, really like Idiotest to write what she thinks. She can probably say it better than me as English is not my native language.

-13
The action or process of causing so much damage to something that it no longer exists or cannot be repaired.

09-Apr-2022 20:29:25 - Last edited on 09-Apr-2022 20:29:44 by Destruction

Kathy
May
fmod Member
2011

Kathy

Forum Moderator Posts: 20,217 Opal Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Destruction said :
My suggestions would be lowering fmod counts from 3 to 2 but this can be debated if you put some sort of spam-protect, then 3 is perfectly fine.

I'm open to this as long as you can provide some sort of balance to the game. I am interested in what measures of spam protection you are considering.

Destruction said :
Fmods can win in like 2 minutes by this, not counting abuses from before. Double posting shouldn't reset the thread if it's really an accident because this got abused heavily before, the most I believe.

While it is possible for F-Mods to win quicker, remember that players still do outnumber the Green team. History has actually shown that players have won a lot more than F-Mods. The double posting rule was meant not just for spam discouragement, but as a fun little rule to the game. "Dang, I posted twice! Silly me". Simple haha moment. If you have any ideas on this changing, please do post them.

Destruction said :
When it comes to 00:00 I'm not sure what to say, I mean it could stay but I'd really, really like Idiotest to write what she thinks.

Idiotest is welcome to post what she thinks, but if you have some ideas, I want to hear them. You can think of ways this can be better, I am sure. :P
___

-18
• Kathy •


Forum Help Sticky
|
Sailor Neptune
|
Forum Community Helper

09-Apr-2022 20:45:08

Destruction

Destruction

Posts: 63,021 Emerald Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Spam-protection as in don't post 20 times in a row so you can win in 2 minutes. We saw this balance when you and other person started couting today. It got to -25 including all 3 of us against in couple of minutes which is wrong. When we count 1 by 1 that goes extremely slowly, nowhere near close to those numbers plus you only focused on one thread, we focused on like 20 in same time. I'm even open to discuss about putting normal time limit of posting, don't spam on the thread but post every 2-3 minutes on fair base. Even if regular players ''spam'' it takes long time to reach the number 50 but that is rarely done considering we post on like 2 pages worth of threads rather than spam just 1, that's a fact.

Half-true as players don't really outnumber fmod team when you think about it. Few of them left when someone started heavily abusing thread and who is left now? There is Corder who doesn't post that much to be considered as ''threat'', Idiotest and I. You post even less than Corder but other person is extremely active and she can single handed win against 3 people. Other people who post are here on extremely rare occasions, rest left.

''Simple haha moment'' is not valid as that is what got abused the most. If you can believe someone and if the person is legit then I guess it's fine but current situation is much different, unfortunately. It takes 0.5 seconds to completely ruin the high number and it was done on purpose many times like I've stated. This should be gone forever because some people got discredited by abusing this. Or.. leave the rule for us, if we make mistake - we go back to 0, I'm more than happy with that! I made couple mistakes before and we went to 0 and it was well deserved but if you or another person posts ''on accident'' leave that and ignore it, that way we can stop abusing from happening ever again.

Like I've said, I'd like to hear what Idiotest have to say on 00:00 and I'm not the most creative person either. I don't mind that one

-17
The action or process of causing so much damage to something that it no longer exists or cannot be repaired.

09-Apr-2022 21:04:59

Quick find code: 55-56-549-66249521 Back to Top