I thought that the beginning was a bit untelling. It was a lot of words, but I've gone through it three times now and I have yet to see anything that really happened. It just seemed like you were having a lot of fun describing the tempest, but you didn't tell us anything of import. I would have preferred to have noticed the progress of the storm through the greater lens of learning about the land. Describing the effects on the ghetto was a step in the right direction, but even that was a bit too vague. You took a lot of poetic license in the introduction, and I would have preferred it if you put a few clues as to the setting in there, too. Add another layer of depth, so to speak.
A good example of where you could improve with little work is in the second post, first paragraph. When you begin talking about the eastern coast, and the storm's destination, you should have provided a bit more background information on what that means. What is the eastern coast -- industrial, vacational, sparsely inhabited? Then you could have described the scene instead of merely the action.
Sometimes it seemed like you had awkward word choice. I wasn't fond of "quailed", "sated", etc. Also, when I think of a ghetto, and especially after you validate it through descriptions like "poorly thatched roofs", I do not think of structures too strong for air alone. Adding some definition to the buildings will make seem more deep and will share with the audience the vision that you're obviously having.
21-May-2011 02:42:43
- Last edited on
21-May-2011 17:37:19
by
Yrolg