Google dictionary,
invulnerable
impossible to harm or damage.
Merriam Webster,
invulnerable
incapable of being wounded, injured, or harmed
Cambridge,
invulnerable
impossible to damage or hurt in any way
In this case, I agree with official definitions, as that's what the general idea is. If something happened, and it turns out he isn't invulnerable, then it's still a contradiction. I tend to wrestle with Pink's style as the frequent typos, run-ons, with syntax and punctuation both often wonky, makes memorizing and understanding difficult.
06-May-2022 02:46:38