“He grabs a cannonball that was about the size of a grapefruit. He throws it into the cannon and readies it to shoot.”
Well, you’d need to put the gunpowder in first.
Zin gets stabbed in the chest and dies, there’s an exchange of emotional thanks, a statue of Modello is made, and there’s the end.
Richard runs away, and then more humour after the end.
Well, I did*’t have much to say this time as I felt quite weak this week. I did*’t want to repeat too much, but your villains are perhaps too general most of the time, such as the evil knights spitting at peasants, the evil general ordering the killing of a girl and getting owned, and the evil gods who say basically the same thing whenever heroes do things. But oh well, I shouldn’t recreate the same discussion again.
I liked the diversity of attitudes and interaction amongst your heroes; did you perhaps think of putting it within your villains a bit more often? I think that’d be a good idea, at times it was like you only did what you were good at for one side, or maybe it’s just me. Oh well, that's that then, thank-you for making this story.
Oh, and thinking about your statement about “Ultimate Warrior Knight vs. Pirate,” I just wanted to point out that knights who remained in the military (who were quite few in number from the late sixteenth century) often brought with them multiple, large/long pistols, which they would use at close range (or even point-blank). If you wiki Greenwich armour and scroll down three thirds, it’ll show an illustration and real equipment of Sir John Smythe, whose equipment and illustration clearly show that he had a pistol.
And then, you can wiki Reiter and scroll down to see the size difference of cavalry pistols to normal ones.
So, if a knight were equipped with pistols as they were historically, who is to say a pirate will defeat a knight?
03-Aug-2013 04:24:37
- Last edited on
03-Aug-2013 04:25:25
by
Azigarath