Writing about something you can't perceive is easy to do very badly, which is one of the reasons (I think) why there's so much awful fantasy writing out there. It's much easier to codify all of the rules and laws and build from there instead of keeping something vague and undefined, and trying to hint at a force which goes beyond what can be understood.
I think, for my part, that it's easier than you describe. The solution that's always seemed to work in truly excellent novels is not to describe the intangible force directly, but rather how it manifests in the physical world, with hints that direct the reader to the fact that there is some force begetting them. There can be something beyond comprehension, but once it has a physical effect, it can be guessed at, if not understood. And I am of the opinion that magic should
never
be able to be truly understood. If there is a discipline of magic, it is no longer magic; magic is wondrous and strange and uncontrollable, reached on instinct and a prayer and perhaps a few choice invocations. Magic is power, furious and joyous as a child, and as changeable, and to bind it is to fail at comprehending it.
In my view, anyhow.
Take
The Lord of the Rings
, for instance, the books and not the movie. Magic manifests in the very presence of things like ents and elves, the barrow-wights, the Nazgûl. But it is also in the many chance happenings that lead to a better end, such small moments as Frodo finding flowers on the stone likeness of a king of old, or Aragorn finding the long-lost sapling of an ancient tree on a weathered, blasted slope. Magic need not be spells and deeds of men. It need only be present in a world to have a role, whether a force for good or ill. And while one might not be able to lay out the particulars in only a few posts, that's not the point. It's a glimpse, nothing more—the passage of a shadow one is not sure is there, or a flash of light.
03-Jul-2013 17:43:41