Yevgeniya
said
:
Lord Drakan
said
:
Nice update, but why Bank of
Gielinor
? The planet is called
RuneScape
; 'Gielinor' is super old-fashioned (as in, Ages old)...
Not it's not... RuneScape is the old-fashioned name, lol. As in, that's what it was called back in RSC days.
Roddy Piper
said
:
I was still learning the previous bank update. At least I won't have to hear about this anymore. Been a long time and I was never really interested in it.
Now if you want to talk about reducing the number of items in the game I am all ears. The first place to start is by not making any more items! Unless it is incredibly important, like a new legacy based AOE weapon. That would be worth adding an item for.
And the point of this would be...?
KleinAndi
said
:
Well, for the bank clean-up: it would be nice to have a warning that there will be a return fee
before
retrieving the item from Django...
There has ALWAYS been a fee for anything with combat stats stored with Diango Always
So then I'm correct in saying that f2p didn't get any additional bank space? Seems a bit odd then that it would combine the numbers, that's like "camouflaging" the fact that members get more.
Jimfromtx
said
:
So then I'm correct in saying that f2p didn't get any additional bank space? Seems a bit odd then that it would combine the numbers, that's like "camouflaging" the fact that members get more.
F2p also got a bit - dunno the exact number now, but of those 49 total slots a portion was f2p (so they also have a round number now).
Improvements:
Tooltip
/
(F2P) QoL v2
Quick Fixes:
Invention
01-Oct-2019 07:11:26
- Last edited on
01-Oct-2019 07:19:30
by
Rikornak