Forums

Raids Tweaks & QOL

Quick find code: 380-381-358-65871462

WellGreat
Oct Member 2023

WellGreat

Posts: 24 Bronze Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
There's been too much of tweaking of items and new content. I understand many of the tweaks for good reason, but it's a huge problem to players that own these items. Most of the reason for need of these tweaks comes down to the testing aspect of the game. The testing isn't elaborate enough. Many players understand the ins and outs of high level pvm bossing so when they saw a weapon that is stronger to magic bonus they immediately thought of a list of the strongest mage attacking monsters in the game. The cap on corp shows it was a passing thought but not fully explored. The testing aspect of releases on new gear isn't complete enough. I'm just sorry for the people that had to lose 100m from a nerf that should have been taken consideration of in the player testing aspect of this. The bow was definitely needing a nerf though but this makes players lose too much money for fun and to their disappoint, anger, or sadness, or a combo of the three.

19-Jan-2017 15:30:43

Lil Mileeno
Aug Member 2008

Lil Mileeno

Posts: 53 Iron Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
In Old School Content Poll #50 , I noticed Question #9 states, "Should the Armadyl set be changed to show less skin on male characters?" Personally, I love the way it looks bearing more skin on male characters, and I totally disagree with this change because that wasn't how the set was intended to look in the first place. It had looked this way for years even back when GWD was first released on the main game. It's avian armor and was supposed to mirror how it looks on them, not how humans think it should look!

If anything, why wasn't an ornament kit added to the game that allowed to give the armor a more unique appearance instead? This is old school for a reason, and should remain as such with all armor appearances taking the old-school look as intended. Gosh! Does it really have to be RS3 again? Here we go again with the Year of the Fixes.
~
Lil
~

---%--
(()

1-time RS3 Skill Master
|

19-Jan-2017 19:51:45

Metal Little
Dec Member 2006

Metal Little

Posts: 2,377 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Lil Mileeno said :
In Old School Content Poll #50 , I noticed Question #9 states, "Should the Armadyl set be changed to show less skin on male characters?" Personally, I love the way it looks bearing more skin on male characters, and I totally disagree with this change because that wasn't how the set was intended to look in the first place. It had looked this way for years even back when GWD was first released on the main game. It's avian armor and was supposed to mirror how it looks on them, not how humans think it should look!

If anything, why wasn't an ornament kit added to the game that allowed to give the armor a more unique appearance instead? This is old school for a reason, and should remain as such with all armor appearances taking the old-school look as intended. Gosh! Does it really have to be RS3 again? Here we go again with the Year of the Fixes.


Save male Armadyl! I couldn't agree with you more, mate! These are the kinds of flipping changes that have no real benefit to the game aside from angering a group of people who actually enjoyed the original content and how it looked and was intended to look. Do we really want another RS3 now with the GE and these stupid armor appearance changes again like how it ushered in the Year of the Fixes? I can't wait until every single armor piece gets ruined before finally adding EOC on OSR.
~
Metal
~

Bring back the old look on male Armadyl armor!

52-time OSRS/3 Skill Master

19-Jan-2017 19:56:20 - Last edited on 19-Jan-2017 20:04:51 by Metal Little

Quick find code: 380-381-358-65871462 Back to Top