Just because we don't know of Bandos suffering any causalities doesn't mean he didn't. The fact an entire area was apparently destroyed overnight certainly implies he and his followers suffered to some degree. But Bandos would probably use any measures at his disposal to ensure both victory and his own safety anyway. Why risk things when he can come up with a way to deal with the situation and keep himself safe at the same time?
As to why he never said anything about what happened, maybe he considered what he did cowardly, or otherwise not fitting in with his philosophy? He'd hardly want to advertise the fact that he was either unable to kill something, or that he gave it mercy. Heck, it's possible that he did actually intend to kill Xau-Tak, and maybe that he didn't even know that Xau-Tak survived.
If he did know, as to why he never did it again, it could be that the circumstances that allowed such a thing to happen were unique to Xau-Tak. Like Xau-Tak doing it to itself to recover after fighting with Bandos or something. Even if Bandos were able to replicate the circumstances, he wouldn't have a desire to, since he finds the actual fight more enjoyable than victory.
I get the feeling that Xau-Tak may have changed its approach to things since then, so there's no real telling what it would do after getting free. And Zaros and Seren are currently busy with other matters.
You never were our brightest star, Khazard. 'Vermin slaughtered like lambs'? What does that even mean?
15-Sep-2016 17:56:58
- Last edited on
15-Sep-2016 17:57:35
by
Wahisietel