- Soul represents the final stage in the progression of magical elements, because unlike its predecessors it is a concept and not a metaphor. The foregoing elements pick out some single aspect of reality as more or most important - the concept of soul does the same, but it is also more flexibly applicable to all that we experience - we identify individual simple, sentient, and sapient souls, souls that encompass other souls, and souls that animate whole worlds. The soul is life, the activity that is the condition for all further activity - all that is is by virtue of soul.
I could add a little more on astral, nebulous, elemental, catalytic, and Armadyl runes, and the runecrafting altar, but I will save that for later.
Anyway, this account is not helpful at all for addressing the opposite-ness of Zaros and Seren, but I hope it might co-exist with the spectrum-image. So I think your account, Armacus, is pretty good. I would only object to the idea that Zaros is
wholly
to be identified with death and that Seren is
wholly
to be identified with soul - there is more to being either of them.
Aquamancer, I have to agree with Cthris against you. I think soul is life - or at least I think developing the concepts in this Aristotelian direction is the most promising way to take the lore. I would want to say that the soul simply is the life of the body, not an entity whence something is transferred to the body. I would also want to treat quantified life-force or anima as something we experience interiorly, like desire, stirred by our psychosomatic (bodily and mental) grasp of things in the world.
Your analogy, on the contrary, is Cartesian, separating the mind and body as two distinct entities, whereas if we identify soul and life we need not really separate them from the living, fully functioning body.
04-Feb-2017 22:39:55