Forums
Small Suggestions Thread
Quick find code: 322-323-184-65614746
Many F2P PvPer's have noticed the amount of 85-99 def / 85-99 range that sit out above edge.
These are usually owned by a player who also has a 1 def pure or a 60 attack pure that only fights No-armour.
The problem lies if you attack one of these pure's without asking permission....I mean they stand there in full rune with a skull but if you don't ask or go no armour it's now considered "Rushing"............
Once you have attacked one of these pure's there will always be one of their friends close by who will begin attacking you....They switch the protect prays on & eat to full HP after any damage.
The real problem lies in the amount of "Attack Bonus" rune armour still provides...It's 24 atm for wearing full rune with a maple short bow.......
I believe a Higher Negative bonus would be the solution to this epidemic.....I believe wearing full rune , range should offer a - 33 bonus to render armour useless for rangers.......
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ranger's in medieval times were known for the light & nimble agility...they never wore heavy clunky armour...it would affect their aim..Let alone how would you draw back on a bow wearing full plate armour.......?
Ranger's were known to wear light cloth like material & to engage in combat only as a last resort with a dagger......
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please a higher negative bonus for rangers wearing armour other than dragon-hide......
But an update for the dagger's would counteract any loss the rangers would encounter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It's crushing to spend months , if not years on a account only to be bullied out by another build that has no purpose other than to kill your spirit.......Please help avoid more of this.
What do you call a
These are usually owned by a player who also has a 1 def pure or a 60 attack pure that only fights No-armour.
The problem lies if you attack one of these pure's without asking permission....I mean they stand there in full rune with a skull but if you don't ask or go no armour it's now considered "Rushing"............
Once you have attacked one of these pure's there will always be one of their friends close by who will begin attacking you....They switch the protect prays on & eat to full HP after any damage.
The real problem lies in the amount of "Attack Bonus" rune armour still provides...It's 24 atm for wearing full rune with a maple short bow.......
I believe a Higher Negative bonus would be the solution to this epidemic.....I believe wearing full rune , range should offer a - 33 bonus to render armour useless for rangers.......
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ranger's in medieval times were known for the light & nimble agility...they never wore heavy clunky armour...it would affect their aim..Let alone how would you draw back on a bow wearing full plate armour.......?
Ranger's were known to wear light cloth like material & to engage in combat only as a last resort with a dagger......
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please a higher negative bonus for rangers wearing armour other than dragon-hide......
But an update for the dagger's would counteract any loss the rangers would encounter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It's crushing to spend months , if not years on a account only to be bullied out by another build that has no purpose other than to kill your spirit.......Please help avoid more of this.
What do you call a
wolf
, that eats another
wolf
....?
For the correct answer ,
click here
.
07-Jan-2017 11:22:23
Original message details are unavailable.
dupe you
these tanks are made for one reason. to combat 1def pures.
i know it, you know it.
i will support you in raising the negative range bonus for melee armor
What do you call a
dupe you
these tanks are made for one reason. to combat 1def pures.
i know it, you know it.
i will support you in raising the negative range bonus for melee armor
if we also make it so that all weapons need defence level of their tier
.
What do you call a
wolf
, that eats another
wolf
....?
For the correct answer ,
click here
.
08-Jan-2017 16:04:34
Suggest you take a look at that b4 everyone quits....
Melee armour should not work with range weapons. What do you call a
wolf
, that eats another
wolf
....?
For the correct answer ,
click here
.
09-Jan-2017 12:46:18
Quick find code: 322-323-184-65614746 Back to Top