James Page1
said
:
so just because the person done something once that means everytime will be exactly the same?
Well you did choose Miranda.. I can see you doing that every time. Ew.
I've lost my arrow. Have you seen it? It's been on my mind a lot lately...
Tali Zorah
said
:
James Page1
said
:
so just because the person done something once that means everytime will be exactly the same?
Well you did choose Miranda.. I can see you doing that every time. Ew.
Derailing thread, ban please
But in the case of threads, a group of people is involved. One of them is bound to have something to say against the person, providing that they're renowned enough to have a thread made about them specifically. And things will most likely deteriorate from there.
James Page1
said
:
Tali Zorah
said
:
James Page1
said
:
so just because the person done something once that means everytime will be exactly the same?
Well you did choose Miranda.. I can see you doing that every time. Ew.
Derailing thread, ban please
"Welcome to the High Level Forum General Forum Chat Lounge. Feel free to chat, lounge and have a good time" !??!?!? What D:
I've lost my arrow. Have you seen it? It's been on my mind a lot lately...
Tali Zorah
said
:
James Page1
said
:
Tali Zorah
said
:
James Page1
said
:
so just because the person done something once that means everytime will be exactly the same?
Well you did choose Miranda.. I can see you doing that every time. Ew.
Derailing thread, ban please
"Welcome to the High Level Forum General Forum Chat Lounge. Feel free to chat, lounge and have a good time" !??!?!? What D:
ban now
Loggy
said
:
In the case of the analogy, possibly not.
But in the case of threads, a group of people is involved. One of them is bound to have something to say against the person, providing that they're renowned enough to have a thread made about them specifically. And things will most likely deteriorate from there.
But there is a difference between simply saying something against a person...or disagreeing with Jmods (Reference rule 5 on hlf rules) and attacking/flaming. A lot of Fmods now refer anything as flaming
Seeker
said
:
Disagreeing is trolling and trolling will get you banned.
What if we agree with a troll that was found to be disagreeing with the aforementioned troll; thereby actually agreeing?
I've lost my arrow. Have you seen it? It's been on my mind a lot lately...
James Page1
said
:
But there is a difference between simply saying something against a person...or disagreeing with Jmods (Reference rule 5 on hlf rules) and attacking/flaming. A lot of Fmods now refer anything as flaming
Everyone's interpretation of flaming/trolling is going to be different. Not much we can do about it.
But rule 5 clearly states "in a respectful manner". I wouldn't take that to be posting screenshots designed to make them look bad with their names clearly on them, and continuing to do so after FMods have hidden it and asked for it to stop.
Nor would I say it is making fun of them by suggesting certain people to take their place (as a now locked thread did).