forums.rs

Forums

Wilderness and Free Trade Vote Thread is locked

Quick find code: 254-255-49-62042278

of 2094
Vindictive-L

Vindictive-L

Posts: 47 Bronze Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
please tell me this referendum isnt a front unless more then 1 million people vote. this isnt even all that advertised, i myself and im sure tons of older players pre 2007 will come back and many that have quit over the last 3 years due to the fact that the game was to strict etc will come back.
For instance you posted the referendum in the identical spot the petition was located and then didnt even announce it was that slide show you have in the front of the site, it looks exactly the same as the petition. According to mod mmg this isnt going to happen unless enough people vote even though a referendom quote from dictionary.***
1.
the principle or practice of referring measures proposed or passed by a legislative body to the vote of the electorate for approval or rejection. Compare initiative ( def. 4a ) .
2.
a measure thus referred.
3.
a vote on such a measure.
so far free trade/ wild is winning your vote and to not make it count would turn alot of people on you and probably make alot of people mad enough etc to quit thus making riots etc simaler to after 2007 update changing this game for the last 3 years.
If im willing to come back and put 1 maby 2 accounts as members imagin all the other people willing to do the same
excuse the name i quit a year ago or when ever they started allowing name changes

29-Dec-2010 21:55:29 - Last edited on 29-Dec-2010 21:57:46 by Vindictive-L

Fishinator

Fishinator

Posts: 141 Iron Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
phthartic
Thank you. There is finally somebody on this forum who is wanting people to have definite and legitimate information. Keep up the good work.
Everyone out there who thinks that this vote is flawed because people are accidentally voting yes need to see the truth behind the vote. It would not be a 90% Yes to 8% No because of accidental yes votes.

29-Dec-2010 21:55:33

WUKONG24

WUKONG24

Posts: 853 Gold Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I was shocked when i saw this updated and voted yes straight away, i started playing in 2003 and i loved the old wilderness although the new trade limit is something i feel should stay pureley for those new players wich are less aware and i noticed on the first posts that one randome item should be dropd on death so i agree with this aswell. happy gaming all.

29-Dec-2010 21:56:37

Baboguiche

Baboguiche

Posts: 26 Bronze Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
It will change the concept of Runescape and make it feel like when I started again. When Jagex bring this back they really should consider adding the old tutorial back, and let players choose what one they would like, the old one or the new one. And if anyone that has authority in Jagex considerably high up will consider this opinion or suggestion whatever you would like to call it, will try and be heard and give new players or even old ones the chance to experience the old tutorial for the first time or just to have that feeling of being new again. Yours sincerely Predator 51. ;)

29-Dec-2010 21:58:45 - Last edited on 30-Dec-2010 13:44:04 by Baboguiche

Blizzardsev

Blizzardsev

Posts: 3 Bronze Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Personally, I find myself disappointed with the idea that has crossed Jagex's mind on the issue. You fixed the old problem, why are you creating more work? Equally, it is flawed anyway since this poll will likely be decided by a large amount of low levels who will not have considered both sides of the coin anyway. Sadly, like the climbing boots, and so on, this is another case of trying to fix what is not broken.
Please,
If something isn't broken, don't try to fix it.
Live and let live.. a return to scam, spam and RWT is exactly what we don't need.

29-Dec-2010 21:59:08

Fitmit
Oct Member 2013

Fitmit

Posts: 123 Iron Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Okay lets see.... About 1.2m people voted for it back the first time, and they didn't need the account's passes to vote. ANYONE could have put those names in there, and thats why *here were that many votes, and now there is about 600k people voting for the second half, 90% yes, 8% no, 2% not sure...Where did the other 600k votes go? Yea... and its been 5 days, and those 1.2m votes for the first voting part came in 1 day... So either Jagex will not add free trade and back into the game if they PAY ATTENTION to this, or just comepletly ignore the numbers and pay attention to the percentages of the numbers and say, "Oh, 90% of Runescape players want it back, then we'll give it to them!"

29-Dec-2010 22:05:56

Fitmit
Oct Member 2013

Fitmit

Posts: 123 Iron Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Okay lets see.... About 1.2m people voted for it back the first time, and they didn't need the account's passes to vote. ANYONE could have put those names in there, and thats why there were that many votes, and now there is about 600k people voting for the second half, 90% yes, 8% no, 2% not sure...Where did the other 600k votes go? Yea... and its been 5 days, and those 1.2m votes for the first voting part came in 1 day... So either Jagex will not add free trade and back into the game if they PAY ATTENTION to this, or just comepletly ignore the numbers and pay attention to the percentages of the numbers and say, "Oh, 90% of Runescape players want it back, then we'll give it to them!"

29-Dec-2010 22:06:00

Khanbibi
Jun Member 2009

Khanbibi

Posts: 1,514 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
frosty sith i agree i voted no too.
i do not like the idea of either.
because a lot of pkers have no morals.
btw most are a bunch of kids and they do not care one way or another.
the kids should leave rs. and the aduls should stay.
i am adult myself. btw it is most of the troublemakers on rs are kids themselves looking for trouble.
either you put them in a world and let them kill each other and let us adults play in peace. khanbibi madskills admin

29-Dec-2010 22:06:39

Quick find code: 254-255-49-62042278 Back to Top