Dmbazjrk--
BTW, your name is misleading. It sounds much more like the names of people on the other side of this issue.
" I have encountered more than my share of people who openly stated that they created "extra" accounts so that they could vote more often."
Yeah, people have lately been demanding opponents "back up" their "facts" on this thread, and of course neither side can provide ANY "proof" of what we assert here. I can provide some evidence, however. Page 774 of this thread contains the start of my posts giving evidence that only supporters were manipulating the vote. I gave page numbers of people admitting they cheated the vote, and unsurprisingly, 100% of the examples I was able to find in a couple thousand posts were supporters. Yet the supporters persist in saying 91% of players wanted this, or that the vote wasn't rigged. It's quite astoundingly pathetic.
As to bot programs involved in cheating the vote: there was evidence of that happening very soon after the FIRST vote started; several people on this thread claimed first hand knowledge of programs to harvest valid usernames from the highscores list and vote them when only a username was required to vote.
And of course, if the firs* vote was REALLY an honest predicate to the second vote, the argument that supporters have been using that opponents could have cheated jus* as much as supporters is destroyed, since there's no way to NOT vote "yes" multiple times, but there certainly WAS a way to vote "yes" multiple times, and the evidence is OVERWHELMING that that was done in huge numbers.
And as to in game botting: all I asked as an opponent was a demonstration of their newly proclaimed anti-bot techniques prior to reverting to free trade. To say, as supporters very frequently did, that since botting exists now, it wouldn't be worse after reintroducing free trade is an utterly moronic argument.
17-Jan-2011 20:17:12