Kind sir, I believe it was YOU who started on the education remarks. Your grammar and general logic fails in this conversation and frankly you remind me of a young teenager boasting about himself in order to salvage some respect where he has none.
I wont call you a liar, I have no care in whether you did or did not get educated in aviation - but your arguments are terrible, your debating rotten and your flaming of other players because they're bringing better points to the table than yourself is pathetic.
If you are really as old as you claim, you need to seriously grow up.
(On a side **te, Kepler had more than one law. So knowing what Keplers law is, means nothing. It's like me saying I know what Boeings law is [there isn't one as far as I'm aware] simply because I can see a username)
---------------
Kepler has three laws, actually, so I was wondering which one your name referred to. That aside, astrophysicists (Kepler's laws involve orbits of planets) physicists are supposed to/are taught to look at things from all sides.
Physicists are trained to think scientifically and to look at all variables in a problem. If they don't, bad things can happen, and it does if they fail to do so (imagine the wrong trajectory on an ICBM missle system if Earth's rotation isn't considered). I commend Kepler from the posts I have seen to thoroughly look at the problem at hand. I admit, I have not myself, as intuitively I feel that the game will benefit from the return of these features.
08-Jan-2011 15:06:27
- Last edited on
08-Jan-2011 15:16:20
by
Jacinda