forums.rs

Forums

Wilderness and Free Trade Vote Thread is locked

Quick find code: 254-255-49-62042278

of 2094
5inister

5inister

Posts: 135 Iron Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
@Sir Viette even if this is so it shows people who vote yes are still the majority or if it was the case no voters would of made 1000000000000000000 accounts and voted no if they cared really they're just whining '08+ noobs who skill....

05-Jan-2011 20:47:55

Vetiel

Vetiel

Posts: 178 Iron Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
@Johney525
However, many RWTers are from China and the Chinese government has passed a law that prohibits the sale of virtual money for real life money. Jagex can now prosecute Chinese RWTers (who according to sources, make up about 80-85% of RWTers.) and make far more than the lost membership fees from these RWTers. E-commerce sites also have a ban on virtual item selling as well. Jagex also monitored these and received information on the seller in order to identify them and ban them in game.

05-Jan-2011 20:49:28 - Last edited on 05-Jan-2011 20:51:15 by Vetiel

Sir Viette

Sir Viette

Posts: 1,005 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
@Spr
"even if this is so it shows people who vote yes are still the majority or if it was the case no voters would of made 1000000000000000000 accounts and voted no if they cared really they're just whining '08+ noobs who skill...."

Actually, all it shows is that more yes votes were cast than no votes, and that by a very significant margin. It does not show by what percentage that PEOPLE voted. I feel that yes would still be more than no, BUT that is opinion.
Lets not fool ourselves in believing that this vote provides useful, statistical information.

05-Jan-2011 20:54:50

Mikayy
Apr Member 2023

Mikayy

Posts: 6 Bronze Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I'd love to see the old wilderness back, also free trade.
But there are, like with every update, some ups and downs.
I wouldn't remove G.E. prices at all!
Just make it that people can free trade with other players and show the GE price beneath.
This way, if you want to give someone 5M, you will be able to!
I think wilderness is fine as it is though.
I don't want to be attacked by some guy when I'm doing a clue or something, or they might even be waiting for people to arrive at Stealing Creation.
I like wilderness how it is now.

05-Jan-2011 21:00:39

FredUp

FredUp

Posts: 849 Gold Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Sir Viette give in someone of the peole here don't care how they win as long as the win.
the fact it could be rigged has been brought up several times and all the person bringing it up gets told is there a sore losser.
or that people voting no could cheat to.
they don't get the point that a flawded election should be void and forced into a recount as they see is a victory.
it would be funny if jagex planed it
as we know they said they needed 1 million votes
so just imagine they wanted to see who would make multiple acounts to vote so they could then trace them and accuse them of cheating and get rid of the accounts.
making it easier for them in the future to explain why we don't have wilderness.
by saying well we tried putting it to a vote but people just cheated.
its highly unlikely but the'd have a point if they did ;-P

05-Jan-2011 21:01:13 - Last edited on 05-Jan-2011 21:03:21 by FredUp

Quick find code: 254-255-49-62042278 Back to Top