forums.rs

Forums

Wilderness and Free Trade Vote Thread is locked

Quick find code: 254-255-49-62042278

of 2094
Ancient Rage
Sep Member 2023

Ancient Rage

Posts: 544 Steel Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I didn't see the free trade or wildy in the game ever, but these sound interesting. I have a few questions though.
A. How much change would there be to the trading system? Just that it has an unlimited trade limit?
D. Would bounty hunter return with this update? Would the clan wars dangerous arena be actual items?
B. What about the poor player who wants to do the beacon activity,or kill armoured zombies, or do clue scrolls, or fist of guthix, or kbd, or even a quest such as all fired up, defender of varrock, the curse of arrav, and especially Temple at sennliten? Will this be on every world? will there be an item for the quests making it that people cannot attack you and vice versa while wielding? (or till 15 minutes afterward to avoid abuse)
C. Nice Attempt at covering this up, but its kind of obvious you set this up for restoring the free trade and wildy. There are 200+ votes cast every 5 seconds!! People create random accounts to vote!! ( I saw one recently voted called "vote222" ) You can't vote no, only yes!!! You do not have to log in, you just type in anyones name and submit it as their vote which cannot be taken back, so boycotting doesn't really help!!!! I'm not complaining that much, as long as their are those pvp free items, but this cannot be on every world it just will not work.
To summ it up, the return of the free trade and wildy is an awesome idea, but it needs to be worked on a bit before release.
~~ Acid Cannon

21-Dec-2010 23:41:57 - Last edited on 21-Dec-2010 23:44:00 by Ancient Rage

The contents of this message have been hidden.

21-Dec-2010 23:42:37

Isda
Mar Member 2015

Isda

Posts: 380 Silver Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Hi there,
I find an issue with the fact that many players clicked on the link to see if there was more info or a "No" option, and found themselves voting in favor of the idea without intending to. Is there some way to either put a "Not in favor" option, or perhaps make the wording on the post a bit more precise?
Another problem I see is that there are a lot of people "voting for" others...Essentially they are spam-voting, which I don't think is fair at all. Is Jagex going to discount multiple votes made by the same players? And how is Jagex to know if a player is voting for themselves or not?
And lastly, while I think that it could be fun to have the old Wilderness and free trade back, I agree with a few others that the Wilderness should be limited to different worlds, so it'd be a choice of whether or not someone wants to contend with being ambushed. We've been okay with that sort of arrangement for the current Pk-ing system, why change that?
Thanks, and happy gaming! ;)
~ Minavi
* The truth is elusive; claimed by all, owned by none. *

21-Dec-2010 23:42:37 - Last edited on 23-Dec-2010 05:44:25 by Isda

Terra Ame

Terra Ame

Posts: 42 Bronze Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I would be happy to vote for this on some conditions. To prevent scamming, the wealth transfer meter should be kept with the trade interface. With the wilderness, for doing tasks such as the spirit of summer quests or fighting Chronozon for Family Crest, there should be designated Non player killing wilderness worlds to prevent unnecesary frustration amoung players. If the game can remain moderately unabused, then I'm sure this will be for the better.

21-Dec-2010 23:44:09

Quick find code: 254-255-49-62042278 Back to Top