I'm sorry jagex, but it seems like in a nutshell, you just despise the original combat system, and somehow find an excuse to say "that's impossible without EoC"! let me get this straight, One time you sent me a personal message on feedback of the game. I said that in f2p lots of people are complaining that magic is underpowered. What I wanted was to have higher level robes, and maybe lightning spells *please jagex, magic shouldn't be JUST the elements, add lightning spells, and bring back smoke, shadow, blood, miasmic (give them a different effect to make them more helpful, or add a miasmic diamond in the quest dt though), and god spells while you're at it.* plus, you put EoC banner after EoC banner, it seems like you were only happy to see the original combat system go, and the survey was practically rigged (5 positives and 1 slightly sugar-coated negative) I'd like to see a poll when you're game wasn't purged of people who dislike the eoc where the question is "Should the EoC stay?" and the answers were ONLY yes and no. And jagex I know you worked really hard, and spent a lot of money, and you deserve a pat on the back for your hard work (I admit it, the action bar was much needed to put curses and alternate spells quicker, so thanks jagex) but you have a LOT of people saying the original combat system was okay. By the way, want to know why EoC has all this drama? Because it was forced on us, all complaints were ignored, and there is no loophole. Allow me to explain what I mean by a loophole, Controversial update No.1: Hitpoints to constitution and you're health and prayer x10. Loophole: Dividing by 10. Controversial update No.2: Squeal of fortune Loophole: don't by any spins. Controversial update No.3: EoC Loophole: None (Does momentum grant full protection prayers, god spells, special attacks, the real hitpoints system? NO!) Although you probably know better than to do, don't change just because of me, if many people agree with me, then that's a different story.
25-Dec-2012 15:28:23