Blisterwood's still causing issues, then? Goodgood.
I'd actually forgotten to ask about this. Only Roald mentions it - are we taking this to mean that it isn't happening? I'd argue against that, and I'd say that the dialogue being restricted to Roald means two things. One, that it's small scale, and two, that it's covert. Aeonis** doesn't discuss it. But he's standing right next to Vanescula, and she's already demonstrated she'd be tetchy about anything that might grant humans an upper hand. It'd be a daft subject for a diplomat to raise.
Then of course, you have the issue of Darkmeyer remaining hostile to humans. On the flip side, the Myreque infiltrated it once before en masse and individuals could feasibly do so again, whether perhaps through disguise, under-the-table voluntary tithing, or performing tasks for one vampyre family or another in the new power games Vanescula speaks of. Right here you have a reason for Myreque roleplay to continue.
Captain Rovin's failure to mention it says to me that the rank-and-file aren't being armed with it. It's probably a small-scale build-up of the stuff to use
just in case
hostilities are resumed.
One man's trash is another's treasure, and one man's cash buys another's pleasure.
So I'll rob from the cradle, and I'll rob from the grave; it's just human traffic, and I'm just a slave.
27-Apr-2016 22:54:09