I have a great camera just hiding under my gutter. It can be seen from the path and road. Also has a flashing red led light so people can see it is working.
The thing with it is it has Auto Tracking and If there is a sound it will try and locate it and record it. Now I have then turned off because it was just too much the camera is for ever moving even when the seaguls scream. I now have it static on my garden and the carpark where my car is. It records 24/7 30 min files on a 64gig card. I can then view on my phone if needed.
Other Saturday a neighbour asked me if I'd seen anything or anyone around his car as someone nicked his dashcam. He only had it fitted for 3 days poor guy. Checked and saw nothing. I wish it had as I could have found out who nicked it. We all have our suspect who lives about 15-16 houses away even the Police have their suspicions it was him. Just no proof.
I now remove the 2 dashcams from my car when I'm at home. I'd hate to lose over £500's worth of camers and cards and all the cables.
I've read into the story a lot more now and can see the judges position. I still feel she is wrong as anyone can film and record anything thats public that includes andthing around your garden. I still feel if the Dr's house is robbed she would be the first to ask them for footage.
Now if it was Me who lived next door or a commen person and not a Dr would I or anyother person have got the £100,000 compen. Or would we just have felt the camers can keep an eye on the neightbourhood and keep us safe.... I just don't get the Dr and why shes so upset.
I want the guy to goto appeal and win. As now anyone who has a camera setup might be at court over footage and sound recorded. It's a huge Pandoras box thats a about to open.
Millions of camers around the UK and World to keep us protected.
Comprehensive Account Security
The thing with it is it has Auto Tracking and If there is a sound it will try and locate it and record it. Now I have then turned off because it was just too much the camera is for ever moving even when the seaguls scream. I now have it static on my garden and the carpark where my car is. It records 24/7 30 min files on a 64gig card. I can then view on my phone if needed.
Other Saturday a neighbour asked me if I'd seen anything or anyone around his car as someone nicked his dashcam. He only had it fitted for 3 days poor guy. Checked and saw nothing. I wish it had as I could have found out who nicked it. We all have our suspect who lives about 15-16 houses away even the Police have their suspicions it was him. Just no proof.
I now remove the 2 dashcams from my car when I'm at home. I'd hate to lose over £500's worth of camers and cards and all the cables.
I've read into the story a lot more now and can see the judges position. I still feel she is wrong as anyone can film and record anything thats public that includes andthing around your garden. I still feel if the Dr's house is robbed she would be the first to ask them for footage.
Now if it was Me who lived next door or a commen person and not a Dr would I or anyother person have got the £100,000 compen. Or would we just have felt the camers can keep an eye on the neightbourhood and keep us safe.... I just don't get the Dr and why shes so upset.
I want the guy to goto appeal and win. As now anyone who has a camera setup might be at court over footage and sound recorded. It's a huge Pandoras box thats a about to open.
Millions of camers around the UK and World to keep us protected.
Comprehensive Account Security
What do snowmen have for breakfast? Snowflakes!
17-Oct-2021 12:46:24
