forums.rs

Forums

Graahk Runecrafting Guide

Quick find code: 98-99-907-58771650

of 67
Sif Sigma

Sif Sigma

Posts: 1,968 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I took a look at the guide, and it gave me the basic idea for training using graahks, so thank you for that. What I found really interesting however is the group of flamers who came after who's moral duty was to call you a noob for any time errors...which makes no sense. I mean, shouldn't they be busy training their runecrafting so they can have the bragging rights of being in the top 99 or whatever "goals" they have? Anyway, I couldn't care less about shaving 7 milliseconds off my time every hour. Thanks for the guide, I got the level I was after within the first hour (50 for quest cape), which was a lot faster than I expected, especially with so little time online. It's a great beginner's guide.

24-May-2009 07:03:08

PlasmaMortal

PlasmaMortal

Posts: 6,550 Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
*Very* well written guide. I do have a question though.
Is it advisable to use the Graahk method if you do not have 91 runecrafting? I currently have 64 runecrafting, but I do have 57 summoning, so I am wondering if you believe it is advisable to craft natures before 91 using this method?

25-May-2009 18:32:19

Munyi

Munyi

Posts: 876 Gold Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I still can't believe those high-ranked runecrafters bashing this guide simply because it uses a different method than theirs. Unless they've tried this method, and perfected it, they shouldn't say it fails, anyway. Especially when one of them points out the thread starter failed, for not looking at the method of not banking the nats.
You seem to forget, that for the casual runecrafters like me, those few seconds, or those few nats every hour, don't matter at all. To be honest, this guide helped me a lot - to this point I've always used all four pouches. That's something to rethink now.
It would have shown much more maturity to point out those things in the guide that could've been done better, rather than flaming about the "mistakes". I don't see you guys putting effort into creating a guide to help others!
More on topic - thanks for the guide, it was a good read :)

27-May-2009 21:53:13 - Last edited on 27-May-2009 21:53:34 by Munyi

Quick find code: 98-99-907-58771650 Back to Top