forums.rs

Forums

Land Claims of World 31 T5

Quick find code: 90-91-646-65461586

of 107
Tahmid 1100
Jun Member 2021

Tahmid 1100

Posts: 11,739 Opal Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
At times, one does not want to write out a paragraph. Jor Ulfrsson said :
I would like to propose a few new policies to voting.

-
All members of the World Community, clan representatives and individuals alike, must personally express their opinion on a topic prior to voting.


-
A clan representative or individual may vote on behalf of other individuals, as long as those individuals proceed to and are able to express their opinion and consent on the thread.


-
If an individual cannot use or access the forums, thus they cannot involve themselves within the community, then they will not be included within the vote. The only other acceptable alternative is if a Community meeting is held.


-
Only clan representatives and individuals, members of the World Community may propose a new policy.




* Discussion is free.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Vote: 2-0

(
Yea/For
)
- Kingdom of Ashdale (2)
-


(
Nay/Against
)
-tahmid 1100
- cake owner

11-Sep-2014 12:41:32

AngryAraxxor

AngryAraxxor

Posts: 4,793 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
The first three points all say the same. One must post here for his or her vote to count. No need to overcomplicate it.

As for the last point, I don't know who else would be proposing a vote? ¸¸¸¸¸¸„‹•°Member of
Shuu Zone #1 Community Clan
°•›„¸¸¸¸¸
AngryAraxxor
|
38/46 Insane Final Boss
|
PvPer
PvMer
Community
man

11-Sep-2014 14:45:09 - Last edited on 11-Sep-2014 14:45:30 by AngryAraxxor

Earwax Jax

Earwax Jax

Posts: 2,340 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Tahmid 1100 said :
¥-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-¥¥-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-¥
Suggestions


why not have all the new appliers wait a prohibition of a week before they can vote. also those that don't post anything on this thread for a week or 2 loose all claim and have to restart.

this way you can weed out the people making others obtain votes here by making them sign up. also weed out the people that don't care about the thread and just here to take up time.

Not my place to vote on that, but it sounds like a decent idea :)

11-Sep-2014 16:26:26

Lord Pyro I
Nov Member 2018

Lord Pyro I

Posts: 4,255 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I don't see why this should be said not to make sense from a roleplay point of view. With a simple adjustment I can settle all issues.

I propose that the attacking clan be required to stake the territory that borders the territory they are attacking regardless of value. In rp terms this just means if the defending army wins the attacking army was forced to pull back and regroup losing territory.
While this still stacks the deck in the attackers favour it will now be less in their favour than previously and we won't have to argue about what territory is offered.


Yes For
------------------------------
Lord Bowie (1)
Infernal Phoenix (2)
Ellaria (1)
AncientOrder (2)
Kingdom of Zaros (2)
Empire of Prifddinas (2)
Colonel kate (1)
Innuendo (1)
Lancelotd10 (1)
Zercon* (1)
Zamorak's Union (there's about 10 clans in the union atm I'll leave you to decide how many votes we get)

No Against
------------------------------
Kingdom of Ashdale (2)
Cairo (1)
The White Knights (2)
The Lex Legacy (2)
Michi Lex (1)
Tahmid 1100 (1)
Na vi (1) "The greatest endeavors are achieved because of their selfless intent"
#WarIsComing

11-Sep-2014 17:03:13

Tahmid 1100
Jun Member 2021

Tahmid 1100

Posts: 11,739 Opal Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
That's a lot of points Lord Pyro I said :
Clans within the union include:
Zamorak High Command, Zamorak Cult, The Monks of Zamorak, Zamorak Battalion(s), Divine Khaos, Shadow Brigade ect cake owner

11-Sep-2014 17:17:16 - Last edited on 11-Sep-2014 17:19:21 by Tahmid 1100

AngryAraxxor

AngryAraxxor

Posts: 4,793 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Lord Pyro I said :
I propose that the attacking clan be required to stake the territory that borders the territory they are attacking regardless of value. In rp terms this just means if the defending army wins the attacking army was forced to pull back and regroup losing territory.

Whilst that makes sense in some situations, it doesn't always. Mainly doesn't when your troops travel over unclaimed or other clans' lands to reach the person you're attacking.

I suppose it would then be the land nearest by you'd be staking, but then again isn't that what most people would be doing in the first place (why risk a land in the middle of your territory)? That's assuming you don't have random junk lands in the middle of nowhere, but I think we got rid of those with the reboot. ¸¸¸¸¸¸„‹•°Member of
Shuu Zone #1 Community Clan
°•›„¸¸¸¸¸
AngryAraxxor
|
38/46 Insane Final Boss
|
PvPer
PvMer
Community
man

11-Sep-2014 18:59:04

Jor Ulfrsson

Jor Ulfrsson

Posts: 6,288 Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I would like to propose a few new policies to voting.

- All members of the World Community, clan representatives and individuals alike, must personally express their opinion on a topic prior to voting.

- A clan representative or individual may vote on behalf of other individuals, as long as those individuals proceed to and are able to express their opinion and consent on the thread.

- If an individual cannot use or access the forums, thus they cannot involve themselves within the community, then they will not be included within a vote. The only other acceptable alternative is if a Community meeting is held.

- Only clan representatives and individuals, members of the World Community may propose a new policy.




* Discussion is free.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Vote: 2-1

(Yea/For)
- Kingdom of Ashdale (2)
-


(Nay/Against)
-Tahmid 1100 (1)
-








* Well, the former poll and results were predetermined. Also, in regards to earlier messages, it is necessary for these points to be structured in a way which eliminates loopholes. We find ourselves at the end of our amusements.

11-Sep-2014 18:59:53 - Last edited on 11-Sep-2014 19:23:20 by Jor Ulfrsson

Quick find code: 90-91-646-65461586 Back to Top