Forums

Nex and SS FC Home Thread is locked

Quick find code: 90-91-466-65607736

Rufoo

Rufoo

Posts: 882 Gold Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
10/10 response S oL. Yeah it might be double standards. I'm not really against pcing new items, but it's really gainsaying to our history and actually all first posts on all of our threads. Guess we should really consider what's more worth to us: Staying 'Nex and SS' or gaining popularity. I really plea for the first, but I start to incline for the second. Trouble shoot Nex and SS FC: Click here
Previously known as: rubNN, MeneerWortel, Ruf* the Ufo.

11-Sep-2015 18:08:01

JDogg

JDogg

Posts: 6,876 Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Rufoo said :
10/10 response S oL. Yeah it might be double standards. I'm not really against pcing new items, but it's really gainsaying to our history and actually all first posts on all of our threads. Guess we should really consider what's more worth to us: Staying 'Nex and SS' or gaining popularity. I really plea for the first, but I start to incline for the second.
Perhaps the second view is what we should consider. Potentially these Wyrm hilts? We could poll it ect.

As for Glacors boots, we did poll and pc them for a time, but they were dropped after few requests. If you think they would spice up the line up, we can try them again with a big and flashy campaign ;)
Road to 5.4!

12-Sep-2015 05:39:18

Rufoo

Rufoo

Posts: 882 Gold Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I'm wondering: alot of people seem to join Nex and SS to flip the items. However we've never been a flipchat and never will be. Though we did change the pcing system to get more accurate pcs. An idea that came up to my mind is getting rid of ranges (-/*).
Upsides:
- Accurate pcs
- Recent pcs
- Easier to pc for newcomers
- No ranges (or margins)

Downsides:
- A major change
- No ranges (or margins)
- Getting rid of something thats been there for long time

I'm just thinking, there's no harm done in proposing new ideas.
Trouble shoot Nex and SS FC: Click here
Previously known as: rubNN, MeneerWortel, Ruf* the Ufo.

15-Sep-2015 22:39:19

General Hard

General Hard

Posts: 2,125 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
JDogg said :
Hall of Fame Achievements

Consecutive Hours

Sir Sausage Pcing 30.5 hours Consecutively.
JDogg - Pcing 29 hours Consecutively.
S Z - Pcing 24 hours Consecutively.
Slay_Alot - Pcing 24 hours Consecutively.

Monthly Hours (effective March 2015, minimum of 100)
Sir Sausage - 152 Hours 10 Mins
*Dogg 138 hours


Congratulations Sir Sausage!

Will YOU be the next one on the hall of fame?

Yes I will

16-Sep-2015 03:33:06

JDogg

JDogg

Posts: 6,876 Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Rufoo said :
I'm wondering: alot of people seem to join Nex and SS to flip the items. However we've never been a flipchat and never will be. Though we did change the pcing system to get more accurate pcs. An idea that came up to my mind is getting rid of ranges (-/*).
Upsides:
- Accurate pcs
- Recent pcs
- Easier to pc for newcomers
- No ranges (or margins)

Downsides:
- A major change
- No ranges (or margins)
- Getting rid of something thats been there for long time

I'm just thinking, there's no harm done in proposing new ideas.
The whole .5 thing gives a huge flipchat aroma to it. Perhaps removing the - could be polled?
Road to 5.4!

16-Sep-2015 04:35:35

Rufoo

Rufoo

Posts: 882 Gold Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
JDogg said :
The whole .5 thing gives a huge flipchat aroma to it. Perhaps removing the - could be polled?

I'm not sure if I agree with the first part. It just points the direction of the latest transaction and I do think it makes it maybe a bit more understandable. You might be right we should keep the ~ symbol. It might indeed be an idea to make a poll about removing the - symbol. I have some kind of feeling people might vote no because they prefer margins, but after all we're not a flipchat and the - symbol somehow speaks otherwise.
Trouble shoot Nex and SS FC: Click here
Previously known as: rubNN, MeneerWortel, Ruf* the Ufo.

16-Sep-2015 16:44:39

JDogg

JDogg

Posts: 6,876 Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Rufoo said :
JDogg said :
The whole .5 thing gives a huge flipchat aroma to it. Perhaps removing the - could be polled?

I'm not sure if I agree with the first part. It just points the direction of the latest transaction and I do think it makes it maybe a bit more understandable. You might be right we should keep the ~ symbol. It might indeed be an idea to make a poll about removing the - symbol. I have some kind of feeling people might vote no because they prefer margins, but after all we're not a flipchat and the - symbol somehow speaks otherwise.
This would make it easier and give a small touch up to the pc system as well. We can skip the poll, as it would been weeks of waiting while this is a relatively a safe update. If you still feel removing them would help, feel free to start this during your next PC session and you can test it out ^_^ If it feels right, we will keep using it and update the system.
Road to 5.4!

17-Sep-2015 12:41:38 - Last edited on 17-Sep-2015 12:42:27 by JDogg

JDogg

JDogg

Posts: 6,876 Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Rufoo said :
Alright then, will do. What are your thoughts so far about the Sets, Glacors and Wyrms?
I like the sets. They fit in with NaS and it gives us some higher end items to work with. We did try Glacors in the past, and there weren't many requests for them, but we could re-instate them and give it a go again, no polls about it though. The Wyrm Hilts are very intriguing. It would give a whole new playing field, several new high end items, ( I think they range from 30m-100m), and give players somewhere to stay current with their prices, as the pc thread for them was eaten by the page 51 monster.

The polls give players the ability to vote on the current possible updates, but they often are dry. If we concur on the wyrm hilts, we can start them right out of the gate.
Road to 5.4!

17-Sep-2015 20:49:18

Quick find code: 90-91-466-65607736 Back to Top